From: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>, Todd Kjos <tkjos@android.com>,
Tim Murray <timmurray@google.com>,
Andres Oportus <andresoportus@google.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Chris Redpath <chris.redpath@arm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] cpufreq: schedutil: reset sg_cpus's flags at IDLE enter
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 18:06:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170315180648.GJ18557@e110439-lin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170306092959.561fdf26@gandalf.local.home>
On 06-Mar 09:29, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Mar 2017 09:11:25 +0530
> Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> > On 02-03-17, 15:45, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> > > index e2ed46d..739b29d 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> > > @@ -3653,6 +3653,7 @@ static inline unsigned long rlimit_max(unsigned int limit)
> > > #define SCHED_CPUFREQ_RT (1U << 0)
> > > #define SCHED_CPUFREQ_DL (1U << 1)
> > > #define SCHED_CPUFREQ_IOWAIT (1U << 2)
> > > +#define SCHED_CPUFREQ_IDLE (1U << 3)
> > >
> > > #define SCHED_CPUFREQ_RT_DL (SCHED_CPUFREQ_RT | SCHED_CPUFREQ_DL)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> > > index fd46593..084a98b 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> > > +++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> > > @@ -281,6 +281,12 @@ static void sugov_update_shared(struct update_util_data *hook, u64 time,
> > >
> > > raw_spin_lock(&sg_policy->update_lock);
> > >
> > > + /* CPU is entering IDLE, reset flags without triggering an update */
> > > + if (flags & SCHED_CPUFREQ_IDLE) {
> >
> > Will "flags == SCHED_CPUFREQ_IDLE" generate better assembly ?
> >
>
> Even if it does, a bit check and an equal check are pretty negligible
> in difference wrt execution time. I would choose whatever is the most
> readable to humans.
>
> flags == SCHED_CPUFREQ_IDLE
>
> will tell me (as a reviewer) that we expect no other flag to be set.
>
> flags & SCHED_CPUFREQ_IDLE
>
> will tell me that we only care about the IDLE flag.
>
> Which ever is the more meaningful is what should be used.
Agree on the approach, whenever not silly code should be written to be
easy to understand from other humans.
Here the intent is "whatever flags you set, if the IDLE one is set" we
assume we are entering idle. Thus, to me the current version is easier
to understand without being "overkilling" in its semantics.
Cheers Patrick
--
#include <best/regards.h>
Patrick Bellasi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-15 18:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-02 15:45 [PATCH 0/6] cpufreq: schedutil: fixes for flags updates Patrick Bellasi
2017-03-02 15:45 ` [PATCH 1/6] cpufreq: schedutil: reset sg_cpus's flags at IDLE enter Patrick Bellasi
2017-03-03 3:41 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-03-06 14:29 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-03-15 18:06 ` Patrick Bellasi [this message]
2017-03-28 22:18 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-04-07 14:59 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-06-06 9:26 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-06-06 15:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-06-06 18:03 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-03-02 15:45 ` [PATCH 2/6] cpufreq: schedutil: ignore the sugov kthread for frequencies selections Patrick Bellasi
2017-03-03 5:19 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-03-03 12:12 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-03-06 5:08 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-03-06 14:35 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-03-15 18:02 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-03-02 15:45 ` [PATCH 3/6] cpufreq: schedutil: ensure max frequency while running RT/DL tasks Patrick Bellasi
2017-03-03 8:31 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-03-03 12:38 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-03-15 11:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-03-15 14:40 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-03-15 23:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-03-17 11:36 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-04-07 15:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-04-07 16:59 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-03-02 15:45 ` [PATCH 4/6] cpufreq: schedutil: relax rate-limiting " Patrick Bellasi
2017-03-02 15:45 ` [PATCH 5/6] cpufreq: schedutil: avoid utilisation update when not necessary Patrick Bellasi
2017-03-02 15:45 ` [PATCH 6/6] sched/rt: fast switch to maximum frequency when RT tasks are scheduled Patrick Bellasi
2017-03-02 16:09 ` [PATCH 0/6] cpufreq: schedutil: fixes for flags updates Vincent Guittot
2017-03-02 17:11 ` Patrick Bellasi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170315180648.GJ18557@e110439-lin \
--to=patrick.bellasi@arm.com \
--cc=andresoportus@google.com \
--cc=chris.redpath@arm.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=joelaf@google.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=timmurray@google.com \
--cc=tkjos@android.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox