From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] ftrace/x86_32: Ftrace cleanup and add support for -mfentry
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 15:55:27 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170315195527.703131481@goodmis.org> (raw)
With the issues of gcc screwing around with the mcount stack frame causing
function graph tracer to panic on x86_32, and with Linus saying that we
should start deprecating mcount (at least on x86), I figured that x86_32
needs to support fentry.
First, I renamed mcount_64.S to ftrace_64.S (hmm, my subject says ftrace.S,
oh well, this is still RFC, I'll fix that before posting). As we want to
get away from mcount, having the ftrace code in a file called mcount
seems rather backwards.
Next I moved the ftrace code out of entry_32.S. It's not in entry_64.S
and it does not belong in entry_32.S.
I noticed that the x86_32 code has the same issue as the x86_64 did
in the past with respect to a stack frame. I fixed that just for the main
ftrace_caller. The ftrace_regs_caller is rather special, and so is
function graph tracing.
I realized the ftrace_regs_caller code was complex due to me aggressively
saving flags, even though I could still do push, lea and mov without
changing them. That made the logic a little nicer.
Finally I added the fentry code.
I tested this (and I'm currently testing it) with an old compiler
(for mcount) with and without FRAME_POINTER set. I also did it with
a new compiler (with fentry), with and without FRAME_POINTER. I tested
function tracing, stack tracing, function_graph tracing, and kprobes
(as that uses the ftrace_regs_caller). So far this works. I'm still testing
but I'm confident enough with the current code to post an RFC.
Thoughts?
-- Steve
Steven Rostedt (VMware) (5):
x86/ftrace: Rename mcount_64.S to ftrace.S
ftrace/x86-32: Move the ftrace specific code out of entry_32.S
ftrace/x86_32: Add stack frame pointer to ftrace_caller
ftrace/x86_32: Clean up ftrace_regs_caller
ftrace/x86-32: Add -mfentry support to x86_32 with DYNAMIC_FTRACE set
----
Makefile | 12 +-
arch/x86/Kconfig | 2 +-
arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S | 168 -----------------
arch/x86/kernel/Makefile | 5 +-
arch/x86/kernel/ftrace_32.S | 257 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/x86/kernel/{mcount_64.S => ftrace_64.S} | 0
6 files changed, 267 insertions(+), 177 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 arch/x86/kernel/ftrace_32.S
rename arch/x86/kernel/{mcount_64.S => ftrace_64.S} (100%)
next reply other threads:[~2017-03-15 20:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-15 19:55 Steven Rostedt [this message]
2017-03-15 19:55 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/5] x86/ftrace: Rename mcount_64.S to ftrace.S Steven Rostedt
2017-03-15 19:55 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/5] ftrace/x86-32: Move the ftrace specific code out of entry_32.S Steven Rostedt
2017-03-15 19:55 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/5] ftrace/x86_32: Add stack frame pointer to ftrace_caller Steven Rostedt
2017-03-15 21:13 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-15 19:55 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/5] ftrace/x86_32: Clean up ftrace_regs_caller Steven Rostedt
2017-03-15 21:13 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-15 23:11 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-03-16 8:39 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2017-03-15 19:55 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/5] ftrace/x86-32: Add -mfentry support to x86_32 with DYNAMIC_FTRACE set Steven Rostedt
2017-03-15 21:55 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-15 23:13 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-03-16 9:24 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2017-03-16 13:02 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170315195527.703131481@goodmis.org \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox