From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751899AbdCPI3i (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Mar 2017 04:29:38 -0400 Received: from sub5.mail.dreamhost.com ([208.113.200.129]:39121 "EHLO homiemail-a122.g.dreamhost.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751740AbdCPI3e (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Mar 2017 04:29:34 -0400 Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 09:29:29 +0100 From: Hans Holmberg To: Jonathan Corbet Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib/Kconfig.debug: correct documentation paths Message-ID: <20170316082928.GA5853@Gaia> References: <20161213144054.GA5579@Gaia> <20170224102135.1636b84f@lwn.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170224102135.1636b84f@lwn.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 10:21:35AM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 10:36:20 +0200 > Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > What happened with this patch? I am asking because on top of > > next-20170224 I found some more sysrq.txt obsolete paths... including > > the ones fixed here. I am not sure whether I am fixing something > > already fixed? > > What happened, most likely, is that I saw /lib/Kconfig.debug and assumed > it was one of the many patches sent my way that aren't really up to me to > handle. But nobody else really owns /lib either, I guess. I've dug the > patch out of my archive and will get it in. > Great! I just noticed that the patch does not apply, so i'll rebase it and send out a V2. Thanks, Hans