From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753292AbdCPPRM (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Mar 2017 11:17:12 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:50242 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751182AbdCPPRK (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Mar 2017 11:17:10 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 85ADB61D35 Authentication-Results: ext-mx10.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx10.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=jolsa@redhat.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com 85ADB61D35 Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 16:17:04 +0100 From: Jiri Olsa To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Jiri Olsa , Josh Poimboeuf , gregkh , "kernelci.org bot" , kernel-build-reports@lists.linaro.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , stable@vger.kernel.org, Ralf Baechle , James Hogan , Ingo Molnar , Stephen Rothwell Subject: Re: stable build: 203 builds: 4 failed, 199 passed, 5 errors, 41 warnings (v4.10.1) Message-ID: <20170316151704.GA20999@krava> References: <58b2dc6f.cf4d2e0a.f521.74b3@mx.google.com> <20170315072204.GB26837@kroah.com> <20170316122907.GS12825@kernel.org> <20170316124958.GA3620@krava> <20170316135959.GC3620@krava> <20170316150338.GV12825@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170316150338.GV12825@kernel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.39]); Thu, 16 Mar 2017 15:17:10 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 12:03:38PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 03:39:36PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann escreveu: > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 2:59 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 02:44:45PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > >> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 1:49 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote: > > >> > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 09:29:07AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > >> >> Em Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 02:15:22PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann escreveu: > > >> >> > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 8:22 AM, gregkh wrote: > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > All now queued up in the stable trees, thanks. > > >> >> > > > >> >> > Like 4.9.y it builds clean except for a couple of stack frame size warnings > > >> >> > and this one that continues to puzzle me. > > >> >> > > > >> >> > /bin/sh: 1: /home/buildslave/workspace/kernel-builder/arch/x86/defconfig/allmodconfig+CONFIG_OF=n/label/builder/next/build-x86/tools/objtool//fixdep: > > >> >> > Permission denied > > >> >> > > >> >> Jiri? Josh? > > >> > > > >> > hum, looks like it imight be related to this fix we did for perf: > > >> > abb26210a395 perf tools: Force fixdep compilation at the start of the build > > >> > > > >> > it's forcing fixdep to be build as first.. having it as a simple dependency > > >> > (which AFAICS is objtool case), the make -jX occasionaly raced on high cpu > > >> > servers, and executed unfinished binary, hence the permission fail > > >> > > >> It's probably another variation of this bug, but the commit you cite got merged > > >> into 4.10-rc1, while the problem still persists in mainline (4.11-rc2+). > > > > > > the problem is in objtool build right? the fix was for perf build > > > > Ah, got it. Yes, that must be it then. I supposed we coul duplicate what you > > did for perf in objtool, but a cleaner way would be to generalize it for all of > > tools/, right? right, the thing is that objtool is standalone application like perf, and before their builds can go the 'fixdep' needs to be there.. that's a condition to use the tools/build framework not sure how offensive it'd be to current Makefiles if we come with some generalized code to do that.. I'll think about it, but I think we might be better of the way we are now > > Humm, can't we have just one fixdep? we have.. it's just the matter who will build it first ;-) jirka