From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] perf symbols: Fix symbols__fixup_end heuristic for corner cases
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 11:03:06 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170317140306.17108-2-acme@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170317140306.17108-1-acme@kernel.org>
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
The current symbols__fixup_end() heuristic for the last entry in the rb
tree is suboptimal as it leads to not being able to recognize the symbol
in the call graph in a couple of corner cases, for example:
i) If the symbol has a start address (f.e. exposed via kallsyms)
that is at a page boundary, then the roundup(curr->start, 4096)
for the last entry will result in curr->start == curr->end with
a symbol length of zero.
ii) If the symbol has a start address that is shortly before a page
boundary, then also here, curr->end - curr->start will just be
very few bytes, where it's unrealistic that we could perform a
match against.
Instead, change the heuristic to roundup(curr->start, 4096) + 4096, so
that we can catch such corner cases and have a better chance to find
that specific symbol. It's still just best effort as the real end of the
symbol is unknown to us (and could even be at a larger offset than the
current range), but better than the current situation.
Alexei reported that he recently run into case i) with a JITed eBPF
program (these are all page aligned) as the last symbol which wasn't
properly shown in the call graph (while other eBPF program symbols in
the rb tree were displayed correctly). Since this is a generic issue,
lets try to improve the heuristic a bit.
Reported-and-Tested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Fixes: 2e538c4a1847 ("perf tools: Improve kernel/modules symbol lookup")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/bb5c80d27743be6f12afc68405f1956a330e1bc9.1489614365.git.daniel@iogearbox.net
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
---
tools/perf/util/symbol.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/symbol.c b/tools/perf/util/symbol.c
index 70e389bc4af7..9b4d8ba22fed 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/symbol.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/symbol.c
@@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ void symbols__fixup_end(struct rb_root *symbols)
/* Last entry */
if (curr->end == curr->start)
- curr->end = roundup(curr->start, 4096);
+ curr->end = roundup(curr->start, 4096) + 4096;
}
void __map_groups__fixup_end(struct map_groups *mg, enum map_type type)
--
2.9.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-17 14:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-17 14:03 [GIT PULL 0/1] perf/urgent fix Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-03-17 14:03 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2017-03-17 14:14 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170317140306.17108-2-acme@kernel.org \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).