From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755167AbdCTNH1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Mar 2017 09:07:27 -0400 Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:30156 "EHLO aserp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755111AbdCTNHF (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Mar 2017 09:07:05 -0400 Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 16:06:00 +0300 From: Dan Carpenter To: Arushi Singhal Cc: Sudip Mukherjee , driverdevel , Linux Fbdev development list , Teddy Wang , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] staging: sm750fb: Code readability is improved Message-ID: <20170320130600.GF4343@mwanda> References: <20170319154920.GA12736@arushi-HP-Pavilion-Notebook> <20170320122817.GG4395@mwanda> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Source-IP: aserv0021.oracle.com [141.146.126.233] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 06:25:19PM +0530, Arushi Singhal wrote: > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 5:58 PM, Dan Carpenter > wrote: > > > On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 09:19:20PM +0530, Arushi Singhal wrote: > > > New variables are added to make the code more readable. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Arushi Singhal > > > --- > > > changes in v4 > > > -try to make the code much more readable. > > > - defined the variable at the top of a block. > > > --- > > > drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_mode.c | 57 > > +++++++++++++++++++---------------- > > > 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_mode.c > > b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_mode.c > > > index eea5aef2956f..6517e770e0a7 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_mode.c > > > +++ b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_mode.c > > > @@ -76,38 +76,43 @@ static int programModeRegisters(mode_parameter_t > > *pModeParam, struct pll_value * > > > { > > > int ret = 0; > > > int cnt = 0; > > > - unsigned int tmp, reg; > > > + unsigned int tmp, reg, temp; > > > > Let's not have "tmp" and "temp" both. Generally "tmp" is better because > > you can't confuse it with temperature. > > > > Hi Dan > I have not added the tmp variable. > So is it good to use any other variable like "a" instead of temp. Just re-use "tmp". No need to add "temp". regards, dan carpenter