From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755098AbdCTN5J (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Mar 2017 09:57:09 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:39138 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753188AbdCTN5E (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Mar 2017 09:57:04 -0400 Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 13:56:42 +0000 From: Mark Rutland To: Marc Zyngier , suzuki.poulose@arm.com Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Lezcano , Scott Wood , Will Deacon , Catalin Marinas , Hanjun Guo , Ding Tianhong Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/17] arm64: Allow checking of a CPU-local erratum Message-ID: <20170320135641.GD31213@leverpostej> References: <20170306112622.13853-1-marc.zyngier@arm.com> <20170306112622.13853-4-marc.zyngier@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170306112622.13853-4-marc.zyngier@arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 11:26:08AM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote: > this_cpu_has_cap() only checks the feature array, and not the errata > one. In order to be able to check for a CPU-local erratum, allow it > to inspect the latter as well. > > This is consistent with cpus_have_cap()'s behaviour, which includes > errata already. > > Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier This sounds sensible to me. Suzuki, any comments? Thanks, Mark. > --- > arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 13 +++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c > index abda8e861865..6eb77ae99b79 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c > @@ -1090,20 +1090,29 @@ static void __init setup_feature_capabilities(void) > * Check if the current CPU has a given feature capability. > * Should be called from non-preemptible context. > */ > -bool this_cpu_has_cap(unsigned int cap) > +static bool __this_cpu_has_cap(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *cap_array, > + unsigned int cap) > { > const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *caps; > > if (WARN_ON(preemptible())) > return false; > > - for (caps = arm64_features; caps->desc; caps++) > + for (caps = cap_array; caps->desc; caps++) > if (caps->capability == cap && caps->matches) > return caps->matches(caps, SCOPE_LOCAL_CPU); > > return false; > } > > +extern const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_errata[]; > + > +bool this_cpu_has_cap(unsigned int cap) > +{ > + return (__this_cpu_has_cap(arm64_features, cap) || > + __this_cpu_has_cap(arm64_errata, cap)); > +} > + > void __init setup_cpu_features(void) > { > u32 cwg; > -- > 2.11.0 >