From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>, Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drm-tegra tree with the drm tree
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 15:10:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170321141031.GG30407@ulmo.ba.sec> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170321114545.39fdd45a@canb.auug.org.au>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1018 bytes --]
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 11:45:45AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the drm-tegra tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/drm.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 10437d9b475e ("drm: tegra: use vblank hooks in struct drm_crtc_funcs")
>
> from the drm tree and commit:
>
> 3f2ea8cee24f ("drm/tegra: Don't leak kernel pointer to userspace")
>
> from the drm-tegra tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
Stephen,
your resolution looks good to me.
Dave,
the conflict is fairly trivial to resolve, but if you prefer I can
rebase the Tegra tree onto your -next to avoid it.
Thierry
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-21 14:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-21 0:45 linux-next: manual merge of the drm-tegra tree with the drm tree Stephen Rothwell
2017-03-21 14:10 ` Thierry Reding [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-06-16 1:12 Stephen Rothwell
2022-02-23 16:30 broonie
2022-02-28 3:30 ` Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170321141031.GG30407@ulmo.ba.sec \
--to=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=shawn.guo@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox