From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: schedutil: Always trace frequency if it does not change
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 10:29:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170322092951.GX5680@worktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <10655562.4O9KtquB0A@aspire.rjw.lan>
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 01:56:53AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>
> sugov_update_commit() calls trace_cpu_frequency() to record the
> current CPU frequency if it has not changed in the fast switch case
> to prevent utilities from getting confused (they may report that the
> CPU is idle if the frequency has not been recorded for too long, for
> example).
That seems like buggy tools; we should then fix the tools, not the
kernel to emit more superfluous information.
> However, the same problem may occur for a cpufreq driver that doesn't
> support fast frequency switching and implements the ->target callback
> (that is, it doesn't use frequency tables), but trace_cpu_frequency()
> is not called if frequency updates are skipped in that case.
I'm having trouble parsing that; am I right in understanding this is the
exact same scenario where only superfluous changes are omitted?
> For this reason, modify sugov_update_commit() to always call
> trace_cpu_frequency() when the new frequency to be set is equal to
> the one that was set previously and reorganize the code in there to
> reduce duplication somewhat.
So why not fix the tools?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-22 9:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-22 0:56 [PATCH] cpufreq: schedutil: Always trace frequency if it does not change Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-03-22 4:16 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-03-22 9:29 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2017-03-22 9:56 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-03-22 12:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-03-22 14:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-03-22 14:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-22 17:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-03-22 17:32 ` [PATCH v2] cpufreq: schedutil: Trace frequency only if it has changed Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-03-23 4:32 ` Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170322092951.GX5680@worktop \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patrick.bellasi@arm.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox