From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/4] printk: enable printk offloading
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 01:40:40 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170322164040.GC494@tigerII.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170322154327.GD4008@pathway.suse.cz>
Hello,
On (03/22/17 16:43), Petr Mladek wrote:
> The patch looks fine to me. But it might get more complicated
> if we decide to have a global option to avoid the kthread.
> Let's discuss this in the 3rd patch first.
thanks for taking a look.
so I was going to publish a new patch set tonight, but now I think I'll
wait for a day or two, since there are potentially more people looking
at 0003 now.
in the meantime, I uploaded the patches to
https://github.com/sergey-senozhatsky/linux-next-ss/commits/printk-kthread
there are some splits/reworks/etc.
-ss
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-22 16:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-06 12:45 [RFC][PATCH 0/4] printk: introduce printing kernel thread Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-03-06 12:45 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/4] " Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-03-22 16:40 ` Petr Mladek
2017-03-23 5:12 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-03-23 10:40 ` Petr Mladek
2017-03-24 5:20 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-03-06 12:45 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/4] printk: offload printing from wake_up_klogd_work_func() Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-03-17 12:19 ` Petr Mladek
2017-03-18 9:57 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-03-20 16:09 ` Petr Mladek
2017-03-21 4:01 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-03-23 9:00 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-03-23 12:11 ` Petr Mladek
2017-03-06 12:45 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/4] kernel, power: disable printk_kthread in unsafe places Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-03-22 15:38 ` Petr Mladek
2017-03-06 12:45 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/4] printk: enable printk offloading Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-03-22 15:43 ` Petr Mladek
2017-03-22 16:40 ` Sergey Senozhatsky [this message]
2017-03-22 17:59 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/4] printk: introduce printing kernel thread Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-23 4:09 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-03-23 8:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-24 1:59 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-03-24 4:43 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-03-24 14:43 ` Petr Mladek
2017-03-25 0:18 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-03-23 12:01 ` Petr Mladek
2017-04-03 11:53 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-04-04 12:59 ` Petr Mladek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170322164040.GC494@tigerII.localdomain \
--to=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox