From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
nicolas.pitre@linaro.org, rafael@kernel.org,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 2/3] irq: Track the interrupt timings
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 20:02:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170323190225.GB24630@mai> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170323183542.xfhc4zhjxbyxar57@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 07:35:42PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 06:42:02PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > +/*
> > + * The function record_irq_time is only called in one place in the
> > + * interrupts handler. We want this function always inline so the code
> > + * inside is embedded in the function and the static key branching
> > + * code can act at the higher level. Without the explicit
> > + * __always_inline we can end up with a function call and a small
> > + * overhead in the hotpath for nothing.
> > + */
> > +static __always_inline void record_irq_time(struct irq_desc *desc)
> > +{
> > + if (static_key_enabled(&irq_timing_enabled)) {
>
> I think you meant to have either static_branch_likely() or
> static_branch_unlikely() here. Those are runtime code patched,
> static_key_enabled() generates a regular load and test condition.
>
> Also; if you do something like:
>
> if (!static_branch_likely(&irq_timing_enabled))
> return;
>
> you can save one level of indent.
Ok, thanks for the hint.
> > + if (desc->istate & IRQS_TIMINGS) {
> > + struct irq_timings *timings = this_cpu_ptr(&irq_timings);
> > + unsigned int index = timings->count & IRQ_TIMINGS_MASK;
> > +
> > + timings->values[index].ts = local_clock();
> > + timings->values[index].irq = irq_desc_get_irq(desc);
> > + timings->count++;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +}
>
>
>
> > +DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(irq_timing_enabled);
> > +
> > +DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct irq_timings, irq_timings);
> > +
> > +void irq_timings_enable(void)
> > +{
> > + static_branch_inc(&irq_timing_enabled);
>
> Do you really need counting, or do you want static_branch_enable() here?
I put counting in order to let several subsystem to use the irq timings if it
is needed.
> > +}
> > +
> > +void irq_timings_disable(void)
> > +{
> > + static_branch_dec(&irq_timing_enabled);
>
> idem.
>
> > +}
> > --
> > 1.9.1
> >
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-23 19:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-23 17:42 [PATCH V8 1/3] irq: Add flags to request_percpu_irq function Daniel Lezcano
2017-03-23 17:42 ` [PATCH V8 2/3] irq: Track the interrupt timings Daniel Lezcano
2017-03-23 18:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-23 19:02 ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2017-03-23 19:06 ` Nicolas Pitre
2017-03-23 19:14 ` Nicolas Pitre
2017-03-23 19:38 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-03-23 19:50 ` Nicolas Pitre
2017-03-23 21:17 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-03-23 17:42 ` [PATCH V8 3/3] irq: Compute the periodic interval for interrupts Daniel Lezcano
2017-03-23 19:40 ` Nicolas Pitre
2017-03-24 14:14 ` Daniel Lezcano
2017-03-23 18:34 ` [PATCH V8 1/3] irq: Add flags to request_percpu_irq function Vineet Gupta
2017-03-23 18:54 ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-23 19:19 ` Daniel Lezcano
2017-03-27 8:44 ` Andrew Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170323190225.GB24630@mai \
--to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox