From: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
To: <peterz@infradead.org>, <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <juri.lelli@gmail.com>,
<rostedt@goodmis.org>, <kernel-team@lge.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] sched/deadline: Return the best satisfying affinity and dl in cpudl_find
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 07:36:23 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170323223623.GS11100@X58A-UD3R> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1490265163-29981-9-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com>
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 07:32:43PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> cpudl_find() is used to find a cpu having the latest dl. The function
> should return the latest cpu among ones satisfying task's affinity and
> dl constraint, but current code gives up immediately and just return
> fail when it fails at the test *only with* the maximum cpu.
>
> For example:
>
> cpu 0 is running a task (dl: 10).
> cpu 1 is running a task (dl: 9).
> cpu 2 is running a task (dl: 8).
> cpu 3 is running a task (dl: 2).
^
should be 1
>
> where cpu 3 want to push a task (affinity is 1 2 3 and dl is 1).
^
should be 2
>
> In this case, the task should be migrated from cpu 3 to cpu 1, and
> preempt cpu 1's task. However, current code just returns fail because
> it fails at the affinity test with the maximum cpu, that is, cpu 0.
>
> This patch tries to find the best among ones satisfying task's affinity
> and dl constraint until success or no more to see.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-23 22:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-23 10:32 [PATCH 0/8] sched/deadline: Return the best satisfying affinity and dl in cpudl_find Byungchul Park
2017-03-23 10:32 ` [PATCH 1/8] sched/deadline: Make find_later_rq() choose a closer cpu in topology Byungchul Park
2017-03-23 10:32 ` [PATCH 2/8] sched/deadline: Re-define parameters of cpudl heapify functions Byungchul Park
2017-03-23 10:32 ` [PATCH 3/8] sched/deadline: Add cpudl_maximum_dl() for clean-up Byungchul Park
2017-03-23 10:32 ` [PATCH 4/8] sched/deadline: Factor out the selecting of suitable max cpu Byungchul Park
2017-03-23 10:32 ` [PATCH 5/8] sched/deadline: Protect read of cpudl heap with a lock Byungchul Park
2017-03-23 10:32 ` [PATCH 6/8] sched/deadline: Don't return meaningless cpu in cpudl_maximum_cpu() Byungchul Park
2017-03-23 10:32 ` [PATCH 7/8] sched/deadline: Factor out the modifying of cpudl's heap tree Byungchul Park
2017-03-23 10:32 ` [PATCH 8/8] sched/deadline: Return the best satisfying affinity and dl in cpudl_find Byungchul Park
2017-03-23 22:36 ` Byungchul Park [this message]
2017-03-23 22:35 ` [PATCH 0/8] " Byungchul Park
2017-03-27 14:05 ` Juri Lelli
2017-03-28 0:42 ` Byungchul Park
2017-03-28 7:11 ` Juri Lelli
2017-03-28 7:29 ` Byungchul Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170323223623.GS11100@X58A-UD3R \
--to=byungchul.park@lge.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox