public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <kernel-team@lge.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] mm/zsmalloc: always set movable/highmem flag to the zspage
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 09:34:54 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170324003454.GA8204@bbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170323021023.GA17486@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE>

Hi Joonsoo,

On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 11:10:23AM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 08:10:05PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > Hi Joonsoo,
> > 
> > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 11:46:35AM +0900, js1304@gmail.com wrote:
> > > From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
> > > 
> > > Zspage is always movable and is used through zs_map_object() function
> > > which returns directly accessible pointer that contains content of
> > > zspage. It is independent on the user's allocation flag.
> > > Therefore, it's better to always set movable/highmem flag to the zspage.
> > > After that, we don't need __GFP_MOVABLE/__GFP_HIGHMEM clearing in
> > > cache_alloc_handle()/cache_alloc_zspage() since there is no zs_malloc
> > > caller who specifies __GFP_MOVABLE/__GFP_HIGHMEM.
> > 
> > Hmm, I wanted this when you pointed out to me firstly but when I think
> > again, I don't see it's improvement. Sorry for that.
> > The zs_malloc is exported symbol and it has gfp_t argument so user can
> > do whatever he want with any zone modifiers flags. IOW, if someuser want
> > to allocate pages from {normal|dma} zone by whatever reason, he can
> > omit __GFP_HIGHMEM from the gfp flag to fullfill the goal.
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I don't think that such flexibility makes things better. User cannot
> fully understand what flags are the best since it highly depends on
> implementation detail. For example, __GFP_MOVABLE is needed to

zone modifier(GFP_DMA|DMA32|HIGHMEM|MOVABLE|potentially CMA):
User can select one of zone for his goal by S/W|H/W constraint.

> optimize memory fragmentation and user cannot know it and there is no
> reason that user need to know it. __GFP_HIGHMEM is the similar case.
> He cannot know that he can pass __GFP_HIGHMEM without knowing the
> implementation detail and he cannot know the impact of __GFP_HIGHMEM
> here. So, I think that adding these flags in zsmalloc can be justified.
> 
> Anyway, this patch isn't so important for this series so if you don't
> like it, I will drop it.

Yes, I don't feel strongly we need it at this moment.

Thanks.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-03-24  0:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-16  2:46 [PATCH 0/4] zram: implement deduplication in zram js1304
2017-03-16  2:46 ` [PATCH 1/4] mm/zsmalloc: always set movable/highmem flag to the zspage js1304
2017-03-21 11:10   ` Minchan Kim
2017-03-23  2:10     ` Joonsoo Kim
2017-03-24  0:34       ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2017-03-16  2:46 ` [PATCH 2/4] zram: introduce zram_entry to prepare dedup functionality js1304
2017-03-16  2:46 ` [PATCH 3/4] zram: implement deduplication in zram js1304
2017-03-21 23:41   ` Minchan Kim
2017-03-23  3:04     ` Joonsoo Kim
2017-03-24  0:38       ` Minchan Kim
2017-03-23 13:40   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-03-28  0:28     ` Joonsoo Kim
2017-03-16  2:46 ` [PATCH 4/4] zram: make deduplication feature optional js1304
2017-03-22  0:00   ` Minchan Kim
2017-03-23  3:05     ` Joonsoo Kim
2017-03-27  8:11       ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-03-28  1:02         ` Joonsoo Kim
2017-03-28  2:22           ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-03-28  2:50             ` Minchan Kim
2017-03-28  5:12               ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-03-28  5:57                 ` Minchan Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170324003454.GA8204@bbox \
    --to=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@lge.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox