From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756665AbdCXK6r (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Mar 2017 06:58:47 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f67.google.com ([74.125.82.67]:34500 "EHLO mail-wm0-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751306AbdCXK6h (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Mar 2017 06:58:37 -0400 Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 11:58:14 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" Cc: Andrey Ryabinin , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , x86@kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Arnd Bergmann , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andi Kleen , Dave Hansen , Andy Lutomirski , Michal Hocko , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dmitry Vyukov Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] x86/kasan: Prepare clear_pgds() to switch to Message-ID: <20170324105814.GC20282@gmail.com> References: <20170317185515.8636-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> <20170317185515.8636-5-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> <218853b4-3498-dab9-d1e9-02caed4d9322@virtuozzo.com> <20170322073136.GC13904@gmail.com> <20170324090757.inkuvayf5t7g73po@node.shutemov.name> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170324090757.inkuvayf5t7g73po@node.shutemov.name> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 08:31:36AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Andrey Ryabinin wrote: > > > On 03/17/2017 09:55 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > > > With folded p4d, pgd_clear() is nop. Change clear_pgds() to use > > > > p4d_clear() instead. > > > > > > > > > > You could probably just use set_pgd(pgd_offset_k(start), __pgd(0)); instead of pgd_clear() > > > as we already do in arm64. > > > It's basically pgd_clear() except it's not a nop wih p4d folded. > > > > Makes sense. Kirill, if you agree, mind spinning a v2 patch? > > I can re-spin, if you want. But honestly, I don't think such constructs > help readability. Good point - I'll keep it as-is unless convinced otherwise. Thanks, Ingo