Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/24] 4.9.18-stable review

Kevin Hilman
2017-03-27T16:56:02Z

Hi Javier,

Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> writes:

> Hello Kevin,
>
> On 03/24/2017 08:57 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> + Sjoerd, Javier,
>>
>> kernelci.org bot <bot@kernelci.org> writes:
>>
>>> stable-rc boot: 233 boots: 1 failed, 222 passed with 10 offline (v4.9.17-25-g4d90baeca3c8)
>>>
>>> Full Boot Summary: https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-rc/kernel/v4.9.17-25-g4d90baeca3c8/
>>> Full Build Summary: https://kernelci.org/build/stable-rc/kernel/v4.9.17-25-g4d90baeca3c8/
>>>
>>> Tree: stable-rc
>>> Branch: local/linux-4.9.y
>>> Git Describe: v4.9.17-25-g4d90baeca3c8
>>> Git Commit: 4d90baeca3c8aebdcb6e3ec8a6b31d4279cfbf3d
>>> Git URL: http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
>>> Tested: 62 unique boards, 16 SoC families, 24 builds out of 199
>>>
>>> Boot Regressions Detected:
>>>
>>> arm:
>>>
>>> exynos_defconfig:
>>> exynos5250-snow:
>>> lab-collabora: new failure (last pass: v4.9.17)
>>
>> This one a new regression, but this board is in the Collabora lab and I
>> can't currently bisect remotely.
>>
>> @Sjoerd, Javier: can either of you have a closer look at this?
>>
>> Looks like a failure in the DRM component init path.
>>
>
> This seems to be the bug that's fixed by commit f0a8b49c03d2 ("drm/bridge:
> analogix dp: Fix runtime PM state on driver bind") [0]. I thought it was
> only a regression for v4.10, but it looks like that also affects v4.9.

Thanks for checking.

Do you plan to request a backport to stable v4.9 also?

Thanks,

Kevin