From: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@intel.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/intel_rdt: Implement "update" mode when writing schemata file
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 16:18:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170324231855.GA40624@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1490377918-30686-1-git-send-email-tony.luck@intel.com>
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 10:51:58AM -0700, Luck, Tony wrote:
> From: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
>
> The schemata file can have multiple lines and it is cumbersome to
> update from shell scripts.
"from shell scripts" makes people a bit confused. Not just shell scripts,
C or Java code also can be cumbersome to update the file, right?
> +Reading/writing the schemata file
> +---------------------------------
> +Reading the schemata file will show the state of all resources
> +on all domains. When writing you only need to specify those values
> +which you wish to change. E.g.
User can still write all values including not changed and change just
like 4.10 does. We may say "When writing you can either write all values
or only need to specify those values which you wish to change."?
Thanks.
-Fenghua
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-24 23:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-17 19:38 [PATCH 0/5] x86/intel_rdt: Improvements/Fixes to RDT framework Vikas Shivappa
2017-02-17 19:38 ` [PATCH 1/5] x86/intel_rdt: Update control registers only when user really modifies it Vikas Shivappa
2017-03-01 13:31 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-03-10 0:00 ` Shivappa Vikas
2017-02-17 19:38 ` [PATCH 2/5] x86/intel_rdt: Improvements to parsing schemata Vikas Shivappa
2017-03-01 14:03 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-03-10 0:03 ` Shivappa Vikas
2017-03-10 10:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-03-10 18:25 ` Shivappa Vikas
2017-03-10 18:58 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-03-10 22:05 ` Luck, Tony
2017-03-11 7:47 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-03-24 17:51 ` [PATCH] x86/intel_rdt: Implement "update" mode when writing schemata file Luck, Tony
2017-03-24 23:18 ` Fenghua Yu [this message]
2017-03-30 18:33 ` Shivappa Vikas
2017-03-31 8:24 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-03-31 17:40 ` Shivappa Vikas
2017-03-31 17:49 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-03-31 18:45 ` Shivappa Vikas
2017-02-17 19:38 ` [PATCH 3/5] x86/intel_rdt: Fail early on a resource with incorrect domains Vikas Shivappa
2017-03-01 14:05 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-02-17 19:38 ` [PATCH 4/5] x86/intel_rdt: Reset the cbm MSR during rmdir Vikas Shivappa
2017-03-01 14:11 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-03-10 1:45 ` Shivappa Vikas
2017-02-17 19:38 ` [PATCH 5/5] x86/intel_rdt: hotcpu updates for RDT Vikas Shivappa
2017-03-01 14:24 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-03-30 19:03 ` Shivappa Vikas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170324231855.GA40624@linux.intel.com \
--to=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=vikas.shivappa@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox