From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755536AbdC1Ndc (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Mar 2017 09:33:32 -0400 Received: from mga04.intel.com ([192.55.52.120]:56575 "EHLO mga04.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754750AbdC1Nd3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Mar 2017 09:33:29 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.36,236,1486454400"; d="scan'208";a="65977291" Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 16:32:25 +0300 From: Mika Westerberg To: Linus Walleij Cc: Dmitry Torokhov , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Andy Shevchenko , Alexandre Courbot , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI / gpio: do not fall back to parsing _CRS when we get a deferral Message-ID: <20170328133225.GS2957@lahna.fi.intel.com> References: <20170323202138.GA11912@dtor-ws> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 03:25:56PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 9:21 PM, Dmitry Torokhov > wrote: > > > If, while locating GPIOs by name, we get probe deferral, we should > > immediately report it to caller rather than trying to fall back to parsing > > unnamed GPIOs from _CRS block. > > > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov > > Can I get some indication from Mika/Rafael/Andy whether this is correct? Sorry, I saw the patch but then forgot to ack it. Acked-by: Mika Westerberg