From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>,
Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/1] get_nr_restart_syscall() should return __NR_ia32_restart_syscall if __USER32_CS
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 16:54:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170328145413.GA3164@redhat.com> (raw)
Hello,
get_nr_restart_syscall() is still buggy, TS_I386_REGS_POKED can't
really help and should probably die.
The fix just adds the __USER32_CS check, but perhaps we can avoid
these "fundamentally broken" checks altogether?
Is __NR_ia32_restart_syscall/__NR_restart_syscall the part of ABI?
OK, we probaly can't remove them, at least right now. But what if
we simply add the new syscall number,
#define __NR_new_restart_syscall 383
#define __NR_ia32_new_restart_syscall 383
so that it doesn't depends on bitness and we can just do
static inline unsigned long get_nr_restart_syscall(const struct pt_regs *regs)
{
BUILD_BUG_ON(__NR_ia32_new_restart_syscall != __NR_new_restart_syscall);
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_X32_ABI
return __NR_new_restart_syscall | (regs->orig_ax & __X32_SYSCALL_BIT);
#else
return __NR_new_restart_syscall;
#endif
}
?
Oleg.
next reply other threads:[~2017-03-28 15:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-28 14:54 Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2017-03-28 14:54 ` [PATCH 1/1] get_nr_restart_syscall() should return __NR_ia32_restart_syscall if __USER32_CS Oleg Nesterov
2017-03-28 15:03 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-03-28 16:27 ` Oleg Nesterov
2017-03-28 17:10 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-03-29 15:05 ` Oleg Nesterov
2017-03-29 16:59 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-03-30 15:28 ` Oleg Nesterov
2017-03-30 18:36 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-03-29 16:33 ` syscall_get_error() && TS_ checks Oleg Nesterov
2017-03-29 16:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-03-29 16:55 ` Oleg Nesterov
2017-03-29 16:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-03-29 17:04 ` Oleg Nesterov
2017-03-29 17:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-03-29 18:50 ` Oleg Nesterov
2017-03-29 18:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-03-30 13:51 ` Oleg Nesterov
2017-03-30 15:49 ` Oleg Nesterov
2017-03-30 17:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-03-30 18:23 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-03-30 18:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-03-30 18:59 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-03-30 19:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-03-30 19:21 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-03-30 19:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-03-29 16:56 ` Andy Lutomirski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170328145413.GA3164@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox