From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S932135AbdC1RKr convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Tue, 28 Mar 2017 13:10:47 -0400
Received: from muru.com ([72.249.23.125]:42532 "EHLO muru.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1752585AbdC1RKq (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 28 Mar 2017 13:10:46 -0400
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 10:10:22 -0700
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
        Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>, Marcel Partap <mpartap@gmx.net>,
        Michael Scott <michael.scott@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] regmap: irq: Fix lost interrupts by introducing
 handle_reread
Message-ID: <20170328171022.GZ10760@atomide.com>
References: <20170322171052.7006-1-tony@atomide.com>
 <20170322171052.7006-2-tony@atomide.com>
 <20170327174952.jsfleql654m2h45i@sirena.org.uk>
 <20170328003648.GS10760@atomide.com>
 <20170328151849.uvj2ljkbts4cwksq@sirena.org.uk>
 <20170328154740.GW10760@atomide.com>
 <20170328164911.xwwl3kdy6j2y7hfq@sirena.org.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
In-Reply-To: <20170328164911.xwwl3kdy6j2y7hfq@sirena.org.uk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

* Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> [170328 09:51]:
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 08:47:41AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> [170328 08:21]:
> 
> > > Right, my thinking here is that by pushing into genirq we minimise the
> > > need even further since it'll also be available to drivers not using
> > > regmap-irq.
> 
> > > > like, handle until we get IRQ_NONE? :)
> 
> > > Well, that's what the per driver emulation does so...  yeah.  Probably
> > > with an upper limit on the number of times we do that.
> 
> > OK let's first see how that would work. I'll send a patch
> > for that.
> 
> Thanks.  Can you keep me on the CC please?  It's something I keep
> thinking about looking at myself.

Sure will do, you'll get some shared flames on it :)

Regards,

Tony