From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755991AbdC2KeZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Mar 2017 06:34:25 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:40766 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755904AbdC2KeX (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Mar 2017 06:34:23 -0400 Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 12:34:05 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Marcos Paulo de Souza Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, Doug Oucharek , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Oleg Drokin , Al Viro , Andreas Dilger , lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: lusten: conrpc.c: fix different address space sparse warning Message-ID: <20170329103405.GA4087@kroah.com> References: <20170329021409.24537-1-marcos.souza.org@gmail.com> <20170329073114.GA8459@kroah.com> <20170323190901.GA22066@builder> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170323190901.GA22066@builder> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 04:09:03PM -0300, Marcos Paulo de Souza wrote: > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 09:31:14AM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 11:14:06PM -0300, Marcos Paulo de Souza wrote: > > > head_up parameter is marked with __user attribute, tmp is filled > > > by a copy_from_user from next, that is also marked as __user, so > > > tmp.next needs to be "casted" as __user to make sparse happy. > > > > But is it the correct change? > > I don't know, it's my first sparse patch, so I tried to fix this > warning. > > > > > You also have a typo in your subject :( > > Sorry, didn't noticed yesterday :( > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza > > > --- > > > > > > this is mt first patch addressing an issue of sparse, so let me know > > > if I misunderstood the error message > > > > > > drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/selftest/conrpc.c | 2 +- > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/selftest/conrpc.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/selftest/conrpc.c > > > index c6a683b..fb7ad74 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/selftest/conrpc.c > > > +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/selftest/conrpc.c > > > @@ -487,7 +487,7 @@ lstcon_rpc_trans_interpreter(struct lstcon_rpc_trans *trans, > > > sizeof(struct list_head))) > > > return -EFAULT; > > > > > > - if (tmp.next == head_up) > > > + if ((struct list_head __user *)tmp.next == head_up) > > > > Aer you sure this is correct? __user changes for lustre is not > > trivial... > > > > How did you test this? > > I didn't tested, it just removed the warning. Is this a false positive? I don't know, it's up to you to prove to me that you know this change is correct. You have to justify your changes, and "because checkpatch.pl complained" isn't a valid justification for something like this :) thanks, greg k-h