From: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Duggan <aduggan@synaptics.com>,
linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Nick Dyer <nick@shmanahar.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] Input: synaptics-rmi4 - cleanup SMbus mapping handling
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 11:21:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170331092134.GJ22683@mail.corp.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170325060050.39867-3-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
On Mar 24 2017 or thereabouts, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> There is no reason to copy structures field-by-filed when we can copy
> eements at once.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
> ---
OK, and now I realize why 2/4 was needed. The current code was just
plain wrong because rmiaddr was tagged as __le16. This fixes the storing
issue.
This one (and the previous then):
Reviewed-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Cheers,
Benjamin
> drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_smbus.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_smbus.c b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_smbus.c
> index c8bf49686460..724643bf31a6 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_smbus.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_smbus.c
> @@ -83,62 +83,55 @@ static int rmi_smb_get_command_code(struct rmi_transport_dev *xport,
> {
> struct rmi_smb_xport *rmi_smb =
> container_of(xport, struct rmi_smb_xport, xport);
> + struct mapping_table_entry new_map;
> int i;
> - int retval;
> - struct mapping_table_entry mapping_data[1];
> + int retval = 0;
>
> mutex_lock(&rmi_smb->mappingtable_mutex);
> +
> for (i = 0; i < RMI_SMB2_MAP_SIZE; i++) {
> struct mapping_table_entry *entry = &rmi_smb->mapping_table[i];
> if (le16_to_cpu(entry->rmiaddr) == rmiaddr) {
> if (isread) {
> - if (entry->readcount == bytecount) {
> - *commandcode = i;
> - retval = 0;
> + if (entry->readcount == bytecount)
> goto exit;
> - }
> } else {
> if (entry->flags & RMI_SMB2_MAP_FLAGS_WE) {
> - *commandcode = i;
> - retval = 0;
> goto exit;
> }
> }
> }
> }
> +
> i = rmi_smb->table_index;
> rmi_smb->table_index = (i + 1) % RMI_SMB2_MAP_SIZE;
>
> /* constructs mapping table data entry. 4 bytes each entry */
> - memset(mapping_data, 0, sizeof(mapping_data));
> -
> - mapping_data[0].rmiaddr = cpu_to_le16(rmiaddr);
> - mapping_data[0].readcount = bytecount;
> - mapping_data[0].flags = !isread ? RMI_SMB2_MAP_FLAGS_WE : 0;
> -
> - retval = smb_block_write(xport, i + 0x80, mapping_data,
> - sizeof(mapping_data));
> + memset(&new_map, 0, sizeof(new_map));
> + new_map.rmiaddr = cpu_to_le16(rmiaddr);
> + new_map.readcount = bytecount;
> + new_map.flags = !isread ? RMI_SMB2_MAP_FLAGS_WE : 0;
>
> + retval = smb_block_write(xport, i + 0x80, &new_map, sizeof(new_map));
> if (retval < 0) {
> /*
> * if not written to device mapping table
> * clear the driver mapping table records
> */
> - rmi_smb->mapping_table[i].rmiaddr = 0x0000;
> - rmi_smb->mapping_table[i].readcount = 0;
> - rmi_smb->mapping_table[i].flags = 0;
> - goto exit;
> + memset(&new_map, 0, sizeof(new_map));
> }
> +
> /* save to the driver level mapping table */
> - rmi_smb->mapping_table[i].rmiaddr = rmiaddr;
> - rmi_smb->mapping_table[i].readcount = bytecount;
> - rmi_smb->mapping_table[i].flags = !isread ? RMI_SMB2_MAP_FLAGS_WE : 0;
> - *commandcode = i;
> + rmi_smb->mapping_table[i] = new_map;
>
> exit:
> mutex_unlock(&rmi_smb->mappingtable_mutex);
>
> - return retval;
> + if (retval < 0)
> + return retval;
> +
> + *commandcode = i;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static int rmi_smb_write_block(struct rmi_transport_dev *xport, u16 rmiaddr,
> --
> 2.12.1.578.ge9c3154ca4-goog
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-31 9:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-25 6:00 [PATCH 1/4] Input: synaptics-rmi4 - fix handling failures from rmi_enable_sensor Dmitry Torokhov
2017-03-25 6:00 ` [PATCH 2/4] Input: synaptics-rmi4 - fix endianness issue in SMBus transport Dmitry Torokhov
2017-03-31 9:15 ` Benjamin Tissoires
2017-03-25 6:00 ` [PATCH 3/4] Input: synaptics-rmi4 - cleanup SMbus mapping handling Dmitry Torokhov
2017-03-31 9:21 ` Benjamin Tissoires [this message]
2017-03-25 6:00 ` [PATCH 4/4] Input: synaptics-rmi4 - when registering sensors do not call them "drivers" Dmitry Torokhov
2017-03-31 9:28 ` Benjamin Tissoires
2017-03-31 9:15 ` [PATCH 1/4] Input: synaptics-rmi4 - fix handling failures from rmi_enable_sensor Benjamin Tissoires
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170331092134.GJ22683@mail.corp.redhat.com \
--to=benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com \
--cc=aduggan@synaptics.com \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nick@shmanahar.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox