From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG nohz]: wrong user and system time accounting
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2017 16:40:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170403144047.GA3820@lerouge> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1490880922.4702.66.camel@gmx.de>
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 03:35:22PM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-03-30 at 09:02 -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > On Thu, 2017-03-30 at 14:51 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>
> > > Also, why does it raise power consumption issues?
> >
> > On a system without either nohz_full or nohz idle
> > mode, skewed ticks result in CPU cores waking up
> > at different times, and keeping an idle system
> > consuming power for more time than it would if all
> > the ticks happened simultaneously.
>
> And if your server farm is mostly idle, that power savings may delay
> your bankruptcy proceedings by a whole microsecond ;-)
>
> Or more seriously, what skew does do on boxen of size X today is
> something for perf to say. At the time, removal was very bad for my 8
> socket box, and allegedly caused huge SGI beasts in horrific pain.
I see.
Nohz_full is already bad for powersavings anyway. CPU 0 always ticks :-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-03 14:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-23 20:55 [BUG nohz]: wrong user and system time accounting Luiz Capitulino
2017-03-24 0:56 ` Rik van Riel
2017-03-24 1:05 ` Luiz Capitulino
2017-03-24 1:08 ` Rik van Riel
2017-03-24 1:39 ` Luiz Capitulino
2017-03-27 5:33 ` lkml
2017-03-24 1:52 ` Wanpeng Li
2017-03-24 3:56 ` Luiz Capitulino
2017-03-27 1:56 ` Wanpeng Li
2017-03-27 17:35 ` Rik van Riel
2017-03-28 7:19 ` Wanpeng Li
[not found] ` <20170328132406.7d23579c@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <20170328161454.4a5d9e8b@redhat.com>
2017-03-28 21:01 ` Rik van Riel
2017-03-28 21:26 ` Luiz Capitulino
2017-03-29 9:56 ` Wanpeng Li
2017-03-29 12:56 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2017-03-28 21:24 ` Rik van Riel
2017-03-28 21:30 ` Luiz Capitulino
[not found] ` <20170329131656.1d6cb743@redhat.com>
2017-03-29 20:08 ` Rik van Riel
2017-03-29 22:54 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2017-03-30 12:57 ` Rik van Riel
2017-03-30 1:58 ` Wanpeng Li
2017-03-30 12:40 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2017-03-30 13:19 ` Mike Galbraith
2017-03-30 4:27 ` Mike Galbraith
2017-03-30 6:47 ` Wanpeng Li
2017-03-30 11:52 ` Wanpeng Li
2017-03-30 12:33 ` Mike Galbraith
2017-03-30 13:38 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2017-03-30 13:59 ` Wanpeng Li
2017-03-30 14:18 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2017-03-30 21:25 ` Luiz Capitulino
2017-03-31 20:09 ` Luiz Capitulino
2017-03-31 23:24 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2017-04-01 3:11 ` Luiz Capitulino
2017-04-03 15:23 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2017-04-03 19:06 ` Luiz Capitulino
2017-04-04 17:36 ` Luiz Capitulino
2017-04-05 14:26 ` Rik van Riel
2017-04-11 11:03 ` Wanpeng Li
2017-04-11 11:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-04-11 11:43 ` Wanpeng Li
2017-04-11 14:22 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-04-12 13:18 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2017-04-12 14:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-04-12 15:14 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2017-04-13 4:31 ` Wanpeng Li
2017-04-13 13:32 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2017-05-02 10:01 ` Wanpeng Li
2017-05-15 8:17 ` Wanpeng Li
2017-06-29 17:22 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2017-03-30 12:51 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2017-03-30 13:02 ` Rik van Riel
2017-03-30 13:35 ` Mike Galbraith
2017-04-03 14:40 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2017-04-04 7:32 ` Mike Galbraith
2017-03-30 13:44 ` Frederic Weisbecker
[not found] ` <20170329221700.GB23895@lerouge>
2017-03-29 22:46 ` Wanpeng Li
2017-03-30 2:14 ` Luiz Capitulino
2017-03-30 12:27 ` Wanpeng Li
2017-03-27 18:38 ` Luiz Capitulino
2017-03-28 5:28 ` Wanpeng Li
2017-03-28 13:44 ` Luiz Capitulino
2017-03-29 13:04 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2017-03-29 13:14 ` Rik van Riel
2017-03-29 13:23 ` Luiz Capitulino
2017-03-29 21:12 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2017-03-30 1:48 ` Luiz Capitulino
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170403144047.GA3820@lerouge \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=kernellwp@gmail.com \
--cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox