From: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <gang.wei@intel.com>,
<hpa@linux.intel.com>, <mingo@kernel.org>, <kernel-team@fb.com>,
<ning.sun@intel.com>, <srihan@fb.com>, <alex.eydelberg@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] x86/tboot: add an option to disable iommu force on
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2017 12:19:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170403191927.GA35817@MacBook-Pro.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170322115055.GA35752@dhcp-172-20-162-56.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 07:50:55AM -0400, Shaohua Li wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 11:49:00AM +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > Hi Shaohua,
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 11:37:51AM -0700, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > > IOMMU harms performance signficantly when we run very fast networking
> > > workloads. This is a limitation in hardware based on our observation, so
> > > we'd like to disable the IOMMU force on, but we do want to use TBOOT and
> > > we can sacrifice the DMA security bought by IOMMU. I must admit I know
> > > nothing about TBOOT, but TBOOT guys (cc-ed) think not eabling IOMMU is
> > > totally ok.
> >
> > Can you elaborate a bit more on the setup where the IOMMU still harms
> > network performance? With the recent scalability improvements I measured
> > only a minimal impact on 10GBit networking.
> Hi,
>
> It's 40GB networking doing XDP test. Software overhead is almost unaware, but
> it's the IOTLB miss (based on our analysis) which kills the performance. We
> observed the same performance issue even with software passthrough (identity
> mapping), only the hardware passthrough survives. The pps with iommu (with
> software passthrough) is only about ~30% of that without it.
Hi,
Any update on this?
Thanks,
Shaohua
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-03 19:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-21 18:37 [RFC] x86/tboot: add an option to disable iommu force on Shaohua Li
2017-03-22 10:49 ` Joerg Roedel
2017-03-22 11:50 ` Shaohua Li
2017-04-03 19:19 ` Shaohua Li [this message]
2017-04-07 10:08 ` Joerg Roedel
2017-04-07 21:49 ` Sun, Ning
2017-04-10 4:31 ` Shaohua Li
2017-04-10 21:28 ` Sun, Ning
2017-04-24 16:50 ` Shaohua Li
2017-04-25 11:02 ` Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170403191927.GA35817@MacBook-Pro.local \
--to=shli@fb.com \
--cc=alex.eydelberg@intel.com \
--cc=gang.wei@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jroedel@suse.de \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=ning.sun@intel.com \
--cc=srihan@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox