From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
Cc: "Calvin Owens" <calvinowens@fb.com>,
"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Jiri Slaby" <jslaby@suse.cz>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Manuel Schölling" <manuel.schoelling@gmx.de>,
"Hans de Goede" <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
"Paul Burton" <paul.burton@imgtec.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com,
"Sergey Senozhatsky" <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] printk: Introduce per-console filtering of messages by loglevel
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2017 17:22:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170405152256.GS3452@pathway.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170405021628.GC11669@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain>
On Wed 2017-04-05 11:16:28, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (04/05/17 11:08), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> [..]
> > > stop_critical_timings(); /* don't trace print latency */
> > > - call_console_drivers(ext_text, ext_len, text, len);
> > > + call_console_drivers(ext_text, ext_len, text, len, msg->level);
> > > start_critical_timings();
> > > printk_safe_exit_irqrestore(flags);
> >
> > ok, so the idea is quite clear and reasonable.
> >
> >
> > some thoughts,
> > we have a system-wide suppress_message_printing() loglevel filtering
> > in console_unlock() loop, which sets a limit on loglevel for all of
> > the messages - we don't even msg_print_text() if the message has
> > suppressible loglevel. and this implicitly restricts per-console
> > maxlevels.
> >
> > console_unlock()
> > {
> > for (;;) {
> > ...
> > skip:
> >
> > if (suppress_message_printing(msg->level)) // console_loglevel
> > goto skip;
> >
> > call_console_drivers(msg->level)
> > {
> > if (level > con->maxlevel) // con loglevel
> > continue;
> > ...
> > }
> > }
> > }
> >
> > this can be slightly confusing. what do you think?
>
> one more thing.
>
> this per-console filtering ignores... the "ignore_loglevel" param.
>
> early_param("ignore_loglevel", ignore_loglevel_setup);
> module_param(ignore_loglevel, bool, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR);
> MODULE_PARM_DESC(ignore_loglevel,
> "ignore loglevel setting (prints all kernel messages to the console)");
>
>
> my preference would be preserve "ignore_loglevel" behaviour. if
> we are forced to 'ignore all loglevel filtering' then we should
> do so.
I think about a reasonable behavior. There seems to be three variables
that are related and are in use:
console_level
minimum_console_loglevel
ignore_loglevel
The functions seems to be the following:
+ console_level defines the current maximum level of
messages that appear on all enabled consoles; it
allows to filter out less important ones
+ minimum_console_loglevel defines the minimum
console_loglevel that might be set by userspace
via syslog interface; it prevents userspace from
hiding emergency messages
+ ignore_loglevel allows to see all messages
easily; it is used for debugging
IMPORTANT: console_level is increased in some special
situations to see everything, e.g. in panic(), oops_begin(),
__handle_sysrq().
I guess that people want to see all messages even on the slow
console during panic(), oops(), with ignore_loglevel. It means
that the new per-console setting must not limit it. Also
any console must not go below minimum_console_level.
What about doing it the other way and define min_loglevel
for each console. It might be used to make selected consoles
always more verbose (above current console_level) but it
will not limit the more verbose modes.
Best Regards,
Petr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-05 15:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-04 23:02 [RFC][PATCH 1/2] printk: Introduce per-console filtering of messages by loglevel Calvin Owens
2017-04-04 23:03 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/2] printk: Add /sys/consoles/${con}/ and maxlevel attribute Calvin Owens
2017-04-05 3:30 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-04-05 23:55 ` Calvin Owens
2017-04-05 1:51 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/2] printk: Introduce per-console filtering of messages by loglevel Joe Perches
2017-04-05 2:08 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-04-05 2:16 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-04-05 3:27 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-04-05 23:53 ` Calvin Owens
2017-04-05 15:22 ` Petr Mladek [this message]
2017-04-06 0:38 ` Calvin Owens
2017-04-06 14:02 ` Petr Mladek
2017-04-06 22:52 ` Calvin Owens
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170405152256.GS3452@pathway.suse.cz \
--to=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=calvinowens@fb.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manuel.schoelling@gmx.de \
--cc=paul.burton@imgtec.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox