public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
To: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gang.wei@intel.com,
	hpa@linux.intel.com, mingo@kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com,
	ning.sun@intel.com, srihan@fb.com, alex.eydelberg@intel.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] x86/tboot: add an option to disable iommu force on
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2017 12:08:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170407100840.GB23944@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170403191927.GA35817@MacBook-Pro.local>

On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 12:19:28PM -0700, Shaohua Li wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 07:50:55AM -0400, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 11:49:00AM +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > > Hi Shaohua,
> > > 
> > > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 11:37:51AM -0700, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > > > IOMMU harms performance signficantly when we run very fast networking
> > > > workloads. This is a limitation in hardware based on our observation, so
> > > > we'd like to disable the IOMMU force on, but we do want to use TBOOT and
> > > > we can sacrifice the DMA security bought by IOMMU. I must admit I know
> > > > nothing about TBOOT, but TBOOT guys (cc-ed) think not eabling IOMMU is
> > > > totally ok.
> > > 
> > > Can you elaborate a bit more on the setup where the IOMMU still harms
> > > network performance? With the recent scalability improvements I measured
> > > only a minimal impact on 10GBit networking.
> > Hi,
> > 
> > It's 40GB networking doing XDP test. Software overhead is almost unaware, but
> > it's the IOTLB miss (based on our analysis) which kills the performance. We
> > observed the same performance issue even with software passthrough (identity
> > mapping), only the hardware passthrough survives. The pps with iommu (with
> > software passthrough) is only about ~30% of that without it.
> 
> Any update on this?

An explicit Ack from the tboot guys would be good to have.


	Joerg

  reply	other threads:[~2017-04-07 10:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-21 18:37 [RFC] x86/tboot: add an option to disable iommu force on Shaohua Li
2017-03-22 10:49 ` Joerg Roedel
2017-03-22 11:50   ` Shaohua Li
2017-04-03 19:19     ` Shaohua Li
2017-04-07 10:08       ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
2017-04-07 21:49         ` Sun, Ning
2017-04-10  4:31           ` Shaohua Li
2017-04-10 21:28             ` Sun, Ning
2017-04-24 16:50               ` Shaohua Li
2017-04-25 11:02                 ` Joerg Roedel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170407100840.GB23944@suse.de \
    --to=jroedel@suse.de \
    --cc=alex.eydelberg@intel.com \
    --cc=gang.wei@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=ning.sun@intel.com \
    --cc=shli@fb.com \
    --cc=srihan@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox