Re: Random guest crashes since 5c34d002dcc7 ("virtio_pci: use shared interrupts for virtqueues")

["Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>]

On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 04:20:12PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 09:22:02AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Fri, 2017-04-07 at 09:05 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2017-04-07 at 08:44 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2017-04-07 at 09:24 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 08:03:19AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > > Test tag works fine here w/wo threadirqs, RT works as well.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 	-Mike
> > > > > 
> > > > > Thanks a lot.
> > > > > OK I pushed out two new tags
> > > > > 	test1 with just the cleanup reverts
> > > > > 	test2 with a bugfix in this area
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > I would very much appreciate your testing report on both -
> > > > > should be ok but better make sure.
> > > > 
> > > > Ok, once it percolates out I'll do that.
> > > 
> > > for_linus-10-g960bef2a6172 contains a -ENOBUILD merge conflict.
> > 
> > But test2 works fine w/wo threadirqs.
> 
> Oops. This is what one gets by pushing at 2am. I fixed that one up
> (still didn't even build as I'm in the middle of a conference).
> Also it's actually the reverse test2 is just the revert test1 has
> one more bugfix.
> 
> So I'm inclined to push test2 out to linux-next for now, and will
> add test1 later if it fares well.
> 
> Mike, your testing is very much appreciated!

Oh wait, I still put the ctx feature patches in there :(
Pls ignore, I'll update when I've fixed it up. Sorry about the noise.

> -- 
> MST