public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Jiada Wang <jiada_wang@mentor.com>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org,
	alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, jolsa@kernel.org,
	wangnan0@huawei.com, ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	mhiramat@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	erosca@de.adit-jv.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] perf tools: fix perf build with ARCH=x86_64
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 09:44:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170410074457.GB25354@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <58EAF143.7090509@mentor.com>

On Sun, Apr 09, 2017 at 07:43:15PM -0700, Jiada Wang wrote:
> Hello Jiri
> 
> On 04/09/2017 10:27 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 11:25:44PM -0700, jiada_wang@mentor.com wrote:
> > > From: Jiada Wang<jiada_wang@mentor.com>
> > > 
> > > with commit: 0a943cb10ce78 (tools build: Add HOSTARCH Makefile variable)
> > > the following build failure is seen when build with ARCH=x86_64
> > is that described somewhere as a valid building interface?
> > I never use it so I have no idea.. would you describe your
> > build env/process?
> I used "ARCH=x86_64 make -C tools perf V=1" to build perf for x86_64 ARCH.

you're on x86 machine right? I don't see CROSS_COMPILE being used..

what's the purpose of the ARCH var setup then?

> 
> > > In file included from util/event.c:2:0:
> > >      tools/include/uapi/linux/mman.h:4:27: fatal error: uapi/asm/mman.h: No such file or directory
> > >      compilation terminated.
> > > 
> > > fix this issue by use SRCARCH instead of ARCH in perf.
> > please describe also the the issue itself in the changelog, not just the fix
> I will update changelog with detail information about the issue in v4
> > 
> > 
> > so objtool is using SRCARCH this way, I guess it's fine
> > 
> > if we go this way, you also need to change the pmu-events/Build
> > and there's some comment using $(ARCH) in util/header.c
> will update pmu-events/Build in v4

I'll check

thanks,
jirka

  reply	other threads:[~2017-04-10  7:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-05  6:25 [PATCH v3 0/1] fix perf build issue when ARCH=x86_64 jiada_wang
2017-04-05  6:25 ` [PATCH v3 1/1] perf tools: fix perf build with ARCH=x86_64 jiada_wang
2017-04-09 17:27   ` Jiri Olsa
2017-04-10  2:43     ` Jiada Wang
2017-04-10  7:44       ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2017-04-17  9:31         ` Jiada Wang
2017-04-17 18:30           ` Jiri Olsa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170410074457.GB25354@krava \
    --to=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=erosca@de.adit-jv.com \
    --cc=jiada_wang@mentor.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=wangnan0@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox