From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7 v3] tracing: Make sure rcu_irq_enter() can work for trace_*_rcuidle() trace events
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 11:29:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170410182901.GX1600@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170410181151.708413295@goodmis.org>
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 02:10:12PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
>
> Stack tracing discovered that there's a small location inside the RCU
> infrastructure where calling rcu_irq_enter() does not work. As trace events
> use rcu_irq_enter() it must make sure that it is functionable. A check
> against rcu_irq_enter_disabled() is added with a WARN_ON_ONCE() as no trace
> event should ever be used in that part of RCU. If the warning is triggered,
> then the trace event is ignored.
>
> Restructure the __DO_TRACE() a bit to get rid of the prercu and postrcu,
> and just have an rcucheck that does the work from within the _DO_TRACE()
> macro. gcc optimization will compile out the rcucheck=0 case.
>
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170405093207.404f8deb@gandalf.local.home
>
> Acked-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
As an aside, it looks like the rcu_irq_enter_disabled() settings
in the RCU idle-entry code could be placed under CONFIG_PROVE_RCU=y
should my idle-entry-overhead concerns prove to be well-founded.
The errors would be caught during testing, but no production-side
overhead.
Again, I am not necessarily agitating for this change now, just getting
this possibility on the record. ;-)
Thanx, Paul
> ---
> include/linux/tracepoint.h | 19 +++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/tracepoint.h b/include/linux/tracepoint.h
> index f72fcfe0e66a..cc48cb2ce209 100644
> --- a/include/linux/tracepoint.h
> +++ b/include/linux/tracepoint.h
> @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ extern void syscall_unregfunc(void);
> * as "(void *, void)". The DECLARE_TRACE_NOARGS() will pass in just
> * "void *data", where as the DECLARE_TRACE() will pass in "void *data, proto".
> */
> -#define __DO_TRACE(tp, proto, args, cond, prercu, postrcu) \
> +#define __DO_TRACE(tp, proto, args, cond, rcucheck) \
> do { \
> struct tracepoint_func *it_func_ptr; \
> void *it_func; \
> @@ -136,7 +136,11 @@ extern void syscall_unregfunc(void);
> \
> if (!(cond)) \
> return; \
> - prercu; \
> + if (rcucheck) { \
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(rcu_irq_enter_disabled())) \
> + return; \
> + rcu_irq_enter_irqson(); \
> + } \
> rcu_read_lock_sched_notrace(); \
> it_func_ptr = rcu_dereference_sched((tp)->funcs); \
> if (it_func_ptr) { \
> @@ -147,20 +151,19 @@ extern void syscall_unregfunc(void);
> } while ((++it_func_ptr)->func); \
> } \
> rcu_read_unlock_sched_notrace(); \
> - postrcu; \
> + if (rcucheck) \
> + rcu_irq_exit_irqson(); \
> } while (0)
>
> #ifndef MODULE
> -#define __DECLARE_TRACE_RCU(name, proto, args, cond, data_proto, data_args) \
> +#define __DECLARE_TRACE_RCU(name, proto, args, cond, data_proto, data_args) \
> static inline void trace_##name##_rcuidle(proto) \
> { \
> if (static_key_false(&__tracepoint_##name.key)) \
> __DO_TRACE(&__tracepoint_##name, \
> TP_PROTO(data_proto), \
> TP_ARGS(data_args), \
> - TP_CONDITION(cond), \
> - rcu_irq_enter_irqson(), \
> - rcu_irq_exit_irqson()); \
> + TP_CONDITION(cond), 1); \
> }
> #else
> #define __DECLARE_TRACE_RCU(name, proto, args, cond, data_proto, data_args)
> @@ -186,7 +189,7 @@ extern void syscall_unregfunc(void);
> __DO_TRACE(&__tracepoint_##name, \
> TP_PROTO(data_proto), \
> TP_ARGS(data_args), \
> - TP_CONDITION(cond),,); \
> + TP_CONDITION(cond), 0); \
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_LOCKDEP) && (cond)) { \
> rcu_read_lock_sched_notrace(); \
> rcu_dereference_sched(__tracepoint_##name.funcs);\
> --
> 2.10.2
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-10 18:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-10 18:10 [PATCH 0/7 v3] tracing: Add usecase of synchronize_rcu_tasks() and stack_tracer_disable() Steven Rostedt
2017-04-10 18:10 ` [PATCH 1/7 v3] ftrace: Add use of synchronize_rcu_tasks() with dynamic trampolines Steven Rostedt
2017-04-10 18:10 ` [PATCH 2/7 v3] tracing: Replace the per_cpu() with __this_cpu*() in trace_stack.c Steven Rostedt
2017-04-10 18:15 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-04-10 18:16 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-04-10 18:20 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-04-10 18:31 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-04-10 18:10 ` [PATCH 3/7 v3] tracing: Add stack_tracer_disable/enable() functions Steven Rostedt
2017-04-10 18:10 ` [PATCH 4/7 v3] tracing: Rename trace_active to disable_stack_tracer and inline its modification Steven Rostedt
2017-04-10 18:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-04-10 18:10 ` [PATCH 5/7 v3] rcu: Fix dyntick-idle tracing Steven Rostedt
2017-04-10 18:10 ` [PATCH 6/7 v3] rcu/tracing: Add rcu_disabled to denote when rcu_irq_enter() will not work Steven Rostedt
2017-04-10 18:10 ` [PATCH 7/7 v3] tracing: Make sure rcu_irq_enter() can work for trace_*_rcuidle() trace events Steven Rostedt
2017-04-10 18:29 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2017-04-10 18:32 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-04-10 18:36 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170410182901.GX1600@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).