Re: [tip:x86/mm] x86/asm: Remove __VIRTUAL_MASK_SHIFT==47 assert

[Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>]

* Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 01:50:27PM +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> > Er.... "Change top bits ... ((47 or 56 [bits] depending on paging mode)"?
> > I know that's wrong and that's not what you meant to say,
> > but it can be read this way too. "47th" instead of "47"
> > would eliminate this reading, but you removed "th".
> > 
> > Spell it out to eliminate any chance of confusion:
> > 
> > 	Change top bits to match most significant bit (47th or 56th bit
> > 	depending on paging mode) in the address.
> > 
> 
> ---------------------8<-----------------------
> 
> From 5dec28ba49387ff444e447213b553506e253616d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2017 14:06:15 +0300
> Subject: [PATCH] x86/asm: Fix comment in return_from_SYSCALL_64
> 
> On x86-64 __VIRTUAL_MASK_SHIFT depends on paging mode now.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>

Could you please integrate this into your series to make sure I apply all the 
intended+latest bits?

Thanks,

	Ingo