From: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
To: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: vctrl: Fix out of bounds array access for vctrl->vtable
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 10:11:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170414171137.GK28657@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170414025043.13680-1-axel.lin@ingics.com>
Hi Axel,
El Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 10:50:43AM +0800 Axel Lin ha dit:
> Current code only allocates rdesc->n_voltages entries for vctrl->vtable.
> Thus use rdesc->n_voltages instead of n_voltages in the for loop.
This is intended. n_voltages is the number of voltages of the control
regulator. In the first loop of the function we determine how many of
these voltages are usable by the vctrl regulator (=> rdesc->n_voltages).
The loop that populates vctrl->vtable iterates over n_voltages,
however it skips those that are outside of the voltage range for the
control regulator.
> While at it, also switch to use devm_kcalloc instead of devm_kmalloc_array
> + __GFP_ZERO flag and fix the argument order.
This looks good to me.
Thanks
Matthias
> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>
> ---
> drivers/regulator/vctrl-regulator.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/vctrl-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/vctrl-regulator.c
> index 6baadef..78de002 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/vctrl-regulator.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/vctrl-regulator.c
> @@ -345,9 +345,9 @@ static int vctrl_init_vtable(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - vctrl->vtable = devm_kmalloc_array(
> - &pdev->dev, sizeof(struct vctrl_voltage_table),
> - rdesc->n_voltages, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
> + vctrl->vtable = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, rdesc->n_voltages,
> + sizeof(struct vctrl_voltage_table),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!vctrl->vtable)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> @@ -371,7 +371,7 @@ static int vctrl_init_vtable(struct platform_device *pdev)
> NULL);
>
> /* pre-calculate OVP-safe downward transitions */
> - for (i = n_voltages - 1; i > 0; i--) {
> + for (i = rdesc->n_voltages - 1; i > 0; i--) {
> int j;
> int ovp_min_uV = (vctrl->vtable[i].out *
> (100 - vctrl->ovp_threshold)) / 100;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-14 17:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-14 2:50 [PATCH] regulator: vctrl: Fix out of bounds array access for vctrl->vtable Axel Lin
2017-04-14 17:11 ` Matthias Kaehlcke [this message]
2017-04-14 19:01 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2017-04-14 17:12 ` Applied "regulator: vctrl: Fix out of bounds array access for vctrl->vtable" to the regulator tree Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170414171137.GK28657@google.com \
--to=mka@chromium.org \
--cc=axel.lin@ingics.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox