From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757475AbdDRQDG (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Apr 2017 12:03:06 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:48888 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751849AbdDRQDD (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Apr 2017 12:03:03 -0400 Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 18:02:53 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Nicolas Pitre Cc: Jiri Slaby , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] assorted TTY code cleanups Message-ID: <20170418160253.GA25958@kroah.com> References: <20170412223717.20890-1-nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170412223717.20890-1-nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.1 (2017-04-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 06:37:13PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > Those are, I hope, fairly uncontrovertial patches that should require very > little review as they mostly do code movement providing nice cleanups. > No logical changes are introduced by those patches. > > My minitty patch series is based on top of this, and given the timing, > I don't expect it to go upstream just yet. However the following patches > could be merged separately for the next merge window. All look good and are now applied, thanks. greg k-h