From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mpx: Correctly report do_mpx_bt_fault() failures to user-space
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 14:08:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170420120801.GH5077@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0d387d7f-208e-75aa-55ea-0157412aa4d4@linux.intel.com>
Hi Dave,
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 08:38:03AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> Just to be clear, the thing you're calling "correct" is this do_trap(),
> right?
>
> do_trap(X86_TRAP_BR, SIGSEGV, "bounds", regs, error_code, NULL);
Yes, because it signals the right trap_nr and error_code to user-space.
> do_mpx_bt_fault() can fail for a bunch of reasons:
> * unexpected or invalid value in BNDCSR
> * out of memory (physical or virtual)
> * unresolvable fault walking/filling bounds tables
> * !valid and non-empty bad entry in the bounds tables
>
> This will end up sending a signal that *looks* like a X86_TRAP_BR for
> all of those, including those that are not really bounds-related, like
> unresolvable faults. We also don't populate enough information in the
> siginfo that gets delivered for userspace to resolve the fault.
>
> I'm not sure this patch is the right thing.
The problem is, without this patch the trap_nr reported to user-space is
0, which maps to divide-by-zero. I think this is wrong, and since all
failure cases from do_mpx_bt_fault() can only happen in the #BR
exception handler, I think that reporting X86_TRAP_BR for all failure
cases is the right thing to do.
I don't know whether user-space (with this patch) already gets enough
information from do_trap() to handle all of the above cases, but it is a
step in the right direction.
Joerg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-20 12:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-06 14:19 [PATCH] x86/mpx: Correctly report do_mpx_bt_fault() failures to user-space Joerg Roedel
2017-04-12 7:30 ` [tip:x86/mm] " tip-bot for Joerg Roedel
2017-04-17 15:38 ` [PATCH] " Dave Hansen
2017-04-20 12:08 ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
2017-04-20 15:45 ` Dave Hansen
2017-04-21 12:19 ` Joerg Roedel
2017-04-21 14:30 ` Dave Hansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170420120801.GH5077@suse.de \
--to=jroedel@suse.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox