From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Sjoerd Simons <sjoerd.simons@collabora.co.uk>
Cc: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RFC: serial: core: Dynamic minor support
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 14:15:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170420121544.GA1131@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170420120357.18317-1-sjoerd.simons@collabora.co.uk>
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 02:03:57PM +0200, Sjoerd Simons wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c b/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
> index 3fe56894974a..37014c70dd69 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
> @@ -44,6 +44,32 @@
> */
> static DEFINE_MUTEX(port_mutex);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SERIAL_DYNAMIC_MINORS
> +/* List of uarts to allow for allocation of dynamic minor ranges*/
> +LIST_HEAD(dynamic_uarts);
> +DEFINE_MUTEX(dynamic_uarts_mutex);
Both of these should be static.
> +
> +static void
> +uart_setup_major_minor(struct uart_driver *drv)
> +{
> + int start = 0;
> + struct uart_driver *d;
> +
Why not init the list head in here too?
> + drv->major = LOW_DENSITY_UART_MAJOR;
> + mutex_lock(&dynamic_uarts_mutex);
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(d, &dynamic_uarts, dynamic_uarts) {
> + if (start + drv->nr < d->minor)
> + break;
> + start = d->minor + d->nr;
> + }
> + list_add_tail(&drv->dynamic_uarts, &d->dynamic_uarts);
> + drv->minor = start;
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&dynamic_uarts_mutex);
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> /*
> * lockdep: port->lock is initialized in two places, but we
> * want only one lock-class:
> @@ -2458,6 +2484,11 @@ int uart_register_driver(struct uart_driver *drv)
>
> BUG_ON(drv->state);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SERIAL_DYNAMIC_MINORS
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&drv->dynamic_uarts);
That line should be in the function:
> + uart_setup_major_minor(drv);
> +#endif
And then provide a "empty" function for this if the option is not
enabled, to keep the #ifdef out of the main flow of the code.
> +
> /*
> * Maybe we should be using a slab cache for this, especially if
> * we have a large number of ports to handle.
> @@ -2527,6 +2558,13 @@ void uart_unregister_driver(struct uart_driver *drv)
> put_tty_driver(p);
> for (i = 0; i < drv->nr; i++)
> tty_port_destroy(&drv->state[i].port);
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SERIAL_DYNAMIC_MINORS
> + mutex_lock(&dynamic_uarts_mutex);
> + list_del(&drv->dynamic_uarts);
> + mutex_unlock(&dynamic_uarts_mutex);
> +#endif
Make this a function, like above, and do the same thing to keep #ifdef
out of here.
> +
> kfree(drv->state);
> drv->state = NULL;
> drv->tty_driver = NULL;
> diff --git a/include/linux/serial_core.h b/include/linux/serial_core.h
> index 58484fb35cc8..890bbefb3f90 100644
> --- a/include/linux/serial_core.h
> +++ b/include/linux/serial_core.h
> @@ -31,6 +31,8 @@
> #include <linux/sysrq.h>
> #include <uapi/linux/serial_core.h>
>
> +#define LOW_DENSITY_UART_MAJOR 204
Where are you stealing this from?
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_SERIAL_CORE_CONSOLE
> #define uart_console(port) \
> ((port)->cons && (port)->cons->index == (port)->line)
> @@ -313,6 +315,10 @@ struct uart_driver {
> */
> struct uart_state *state;
> struct tty_driver *tty_driver;
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SERIAL_DYNAMIC_MINORS
> + struct list_head dynamic_uarts;
> +#endif
Why not just always have this?
Nice first try though!
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-20 12:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-20 12:03 [PATCH] RFC: serial: core: Dynamic minor support Sjoerd Simons
2017-04-20 12:15 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2017-04-20 12:44 ` Sjoerd Simons
2017-04-20 12:54 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-04-25 19:43 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170420121544.GA1131@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=jslaby@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sjoerd.simons@collabora.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox