From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S970655AbdDTPcS (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Apr 2017 11:32:18 -0400 Received: from mail-yw0-f178.google.com ([209.85.161.178]:32802 "EHLO mail-yw0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S970531AbdDTPcQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Apr 2017 11:32:16 -0400 Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 09:32:11 -0600 From: Mathieu Poirier To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: LKML , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Steven Rostedt , Sebastian Siewior , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [patch V2 08/24] hwtracing/coresight-etm3x: Use cpuhp_setup_state_nocalls_cpuslocked() Message-ID: <20170420153211.GA11868@linaro.org> References: <20170418170442.665445272@linutronix.de> <20170418170553.026838125@linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170418170553.026838125@linutronix.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 07:04:50PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior > > etm_probe() holds get_online_cpus() while invoking > cpuhp_setup_state_nocalls(). > > cpuhp_setup_state_nocalls() invokes get_online_cpus() as well. This is > correct, but prevents the conversion of the hotplug locking to a percpu > rwsem. > > Use cpuhp_setup_state_nocalls_cpuslocked() to avoid the nested call. > > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner > Cc: Mathieu Poirier > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > > --- > drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm3x.c | 12 ++++++------ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm3x.c > +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm3x.c > @@ -803,12 +803,12 @@ static int etm_probe(struct amba_device > dev_err(dev, "ETM arch init failed\n"); > > if (!etm_count++) { > - cpuhp_setup_state_nocalls(CPUHP_AP_ARM_CORESIGHT_STARTING, > - "arm/coresight:starting", > - etm_starting_cpu, etm_dying_cpu); > - ret = cpuhp_setup_state_nocalls(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN, > - "arm/coresight:online", > - etm_online_cpu, NULL); > + cpuhp_setup_state_nocalls_cpuslocked(CPUHP_AP_ARM_CORESIGHT_STARTING, > + "arm/coresight:starting", > + etm_starting_cpu, etm_dying_cpu); > + ret = cpuhp_setup_state_nocalls_cpuslocked(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN, > + "arm/coresight:online", > + etm_online_cpu, NULL); Checkpatch complains about lines being over 80 characters long. It is better to keep the above or do as follow and make checkpatch happy? cpuhp_setup_state_nocalls_cpuslocked( PUHP_AP_ARM_CORESIGHT_STARTING, "arm/coresight:starting", etm_starting_cpu, etm_dying_cpu); ret = cpuhp_setup_state_nocalls_cpuslocked( CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN, "arm/coresight:online", etm_online_cpu, NULL); Same for coresight-etm4x.c Thanks, Mathieu