From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S3000600AbdD3JFY (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Apr 2017 05:05:24 -0400 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:51017 "EHLO out4-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752699AbdD3JFO (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Apr 2017 05:05:14 -0400 X-ME-Sender: X-Sasl-enc: wX5pgIp/uhkjIpdkqS0WVY4va2hpzHO1xK22eW9xvFYt 1493543112 Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2017 19:05:10 +1000 From: "Tobin C. Harding" To: Dan Carpenter Cc: Ilia Sergachev , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: ks7010: remove line continuations in quoted strings Message-ID: <20170430090510.GC14735@eros> References: <20170428141928.31893-1-ilia.sergachev@unibas.ch> <20170428142617.wdqlotp7ehzbe4ag@mwanda> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170428142617.wdqlotp7ehzbe4ag@mwanda> X-Mailer: Mutt 1.5.24 (2015-08-30) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 05:26:17PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 04:19:28PM +0200, Ilia Sergachev wrote: > > Checkpatch emits WARNING: Avoid line continuations in quoted strings. > > > > Remove line continuations - split strings using quotes. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ilia Sergachev > > --- > > drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_hostif.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------ > > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_hostif.c b/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_hostif.c > > index 7151f16e2f9c..a0c632a52f48 100644 > > --- a/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_hostif.c > > +++ b/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_hostif.c > > @@ -191,9 +191,15 @@ int get_current_ap(struct ks_wlan_private *priv, struct link_ap_info_t *ap_info) > > wireless_send_event(netdev, SIOCGIWAP, &wrqu, NULL); > > } > > DPRINTK(4, "\n Link AP\n"); > > - DPRINTK(4, " bssid=%02X:%02X:%02X:%02X:%02X:%02X\n \ > > - essid=%s\n rate_set=%02X,%02X,%02X,%02X,%02X,%02X,%02X,%02X\n channel=%d\n \ > > - rssi=%d\n sq=%d\n capability=%04X\n", ap->bssid[0], ap->bssid[1], ap->bssid[2], ap->bssid[3], ap->bssid[4], ap->bssid[5], &(ap->ssid.body[0]), ap->rate_set.body[0], ap->rate_set.body[1], ap->rate_set.body[2], ap->rate_set.body[3], ap->rate_set.body[4], ap->rate_set.body[5], ap->rate_set.body[6], ap->rate_set.body[7], ap->channel, ap->rssi, ap->sq, ap->capability); > > + DPRINTK(4, " bssid=%02X:%02X:%02X:%02X:%02X:%02X\n" > > + " essid=%s\n rate_set=%02X,%02X,%02X,%02X,%02X,%02X,%02X,%02X\n" > > + " channel=%d\n rssi=%d\n sq=%d\n capability=%04X\n", > > + ap->bssid[0], ap->bssid[1], ap->bssid[2], > > + ap->bssid[3], ap->bssid[4], ap->bssid[5], > > + &(ap->ssid.body[0]), ap->rate_set.body[0], ap->rate_set.body[1], > > + ap->rate_set.body[2], ap->rate_set.body[3], ap->rate_set.body[4], > > + ap->rate_set.body[5], ap->rate_set.body[6], ap->rate_set.body[7], > > + ap->channel, ap->rssi, ap->sq, ap->capability); > > Could you indent it like this: > > DPRINTK(4, " bssid=%02X:%02X:%02X:%02X:%02X:%02X\n" > " essid=%s\n rate_set=%02X,%02X,%02X,%02X,%02X,%02X,%02X,%02X\n" > " channel=%d\n rssi=%d\n sq=%d\n capability=%04X\n", > ap->bssid[0], ap->bssid[1], ap->bssid[2], > ap->bssid[3], ap->bssid[4], ap->bssid[5], > &(ap->ssid.body[0]), ap->rate_set.body[0], ap->rate_set.body[1], > ap->rate_set.body[2], ap->rate_set.body[3], ap->rate_set.body[4], > ap->rate_set.body[5], ap->rate_set.body[6], ap->rate_set.body[7], > ap->channel, ap->rssi, ap->sq, ap->capability); > > And actually it might be more readable to break it up more: > > DPRINTK(4, " bssid=%02X:%02X:%02X:%02X:%02X:%02X\n" > " essid=%s\n" > " rate_set=%02X,%02X,%02X,%02X,%02X,%02X,%02X,%02X\n" > " channel=%d\n" > " rssi=%d\n" > " sq=%d\n" > " capability=%04X\n", > ap->bssid[0], ap->bssid[1], ap->bssid[2], > ap->bssid[3], ap->bssid[4], ap->bssid[5], > &(ap->ssid.body[0]), ap->rate_set.body[0], ap->rate_set.body[1], > ap->rate_set.body[2], ap->rate_set.body[3], ap->rate_set.body[4], > ap->rate_set.body[5], ap->rate_set.body[6], ap->rate_set.body[7], > ap->channel, ap->rssi, ap->sq, ap->capability); > > Except that's not really how newlines are supposed to work in dmesg... > Whatever. This driver is full of these DPRINTK's, I would like to see them gone once some more testing is done. I don't see any nice way to keep them without upsetting checkpatch. It may not be worth bothering with them for now. thanks, Tobin.