public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
To: <peterz@infradead.org>, <mingo@kernel.org>, <neilb@suse.de>,
	<nab@linux-iscsi.org>, <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: <ying.huang@intel.com>, <oleg@redhat.com>, <shli@kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <kernel-team@lge.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] Don't reinvent the wheel but use existing llist API
Date: Tue, 2 May 2017 17:03:20 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170502080320.GN21430@X58A-UD3R> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1487057190-25191-1-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com>

On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 04:26:21PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:

Hello,

I did what you suggested. Is there anything I shoud do more?
If so, please let know.

Thank you,
Byungchul

> Change from v2
> - replace for_each(wake_list) with the safe version in scheduler.
> - fix a trivial comment in llist.h
> 
> Change from v1
> - split one patch to several ones, one for each subsystem.
> - replace for_each with the safe version where it's necessary.
> 
> Byungchul Park (9):
>   llist: Provide a safe version for llist_for_each
>   bcache: Don't reinvent the wheel but use existing llist API
>   raid5: Don't reinvent the wheel but use existing llist API
>   vhost/scsi: Don't reinvent the wheel but use existing llist API
>   fput: Don't reinvent the wheel but use existing llist API
>   namespace.c: Don't reinvent the wheel but use existing llist API
>   irq_work: Don't reinvent the wheel but use existing llist API
>   sched: Don't reinvent the wheel but use existing llist API
>   mm: Don't reinvent the wheel but use existing llist API
> 
>  drivers/md/bcache/closure.c | 17 +++--------------
>  drivers/md/raid5.c          |  6 ++----
>  drivers/vhost/scsi.c        | 11 +++--------
>  fs/file_table.c             | 12 +++++-------
>  fs/namespace.c              | 12 +++++-------
>  include/linux/llist.h       | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>  kernel/irq_work.c           |  6 +-----
>  kernel/sched/core.c         | 13 ++-----------
>  mm/vmalloc.c                | 10 ++++------
>  9 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 
> *** BLURB HERE ***
> 
> Byungchul Park (9):
>   llist: Provide a safe version for llist_for_each
>   bcache: Don't reinvent the wheel but use existing llist API
>   raid5: Don't reinvent the wheel but use existing llist API
>   vhost/scsi: Don't reinvent the wheel but use existing llist API
>   fput: Don't reinvent the wheel but use existing llist API
>   namespace.c: Don't reinvent the wheel but use existing llist API
>   irq_work: Don't reinvent the wheel but use existing llist API
>   sched: Don't reinvent the wheel but use existing llist API
>   mm: Don't reinvent the wheel but use existing llist API
> 
>  drivers/md/bcache/closure.c | 17 +++--------------
>  drivers/md/raid5.c          |  6 ++----
>  drivers/vhost/scsi.c        | 11 +++--------
>  fs/file_table.c             | 12 +++++-------
>  fs/namespace.c              | 12 +++++-------
>  include/linux/llist.h       | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>  kernel/irq_work.c           |  6 +-----
>  kernel/sched/core.c         | 15 +++------------
>  mm/vmalloc.c                | 10 ++++------
>  9 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 1.9.1

      parent reply	other threads:[~2017-05-02  8:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-14  7:26 [PATCH v3 0/9] Don't reinvent the wheel but use existing llist API Byungchul Park
2017-02-14  7:26 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] llist: Provide a safe version for llist_for_each Byungchul Park
2017-02-14  7:45   ` Huang, Ying
2017-03-02 22:59     ` Byungchul Park
2017-03-21  2:53     ` Byungchul Park
2017-02-14  7:26 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] bcache: Don't reinvent the wheel but use existing llist API Byungchul Park
2017-03-02 23:16   ` Byungchul Park
2017-03-05 19:59     ` Jiri Kosina
2017-03-05 22:51       ` Byungchul Park
2017-03-05 22:54   ` Byungchul Park
2017-03-24  0:27   ` Byungchul Park
2017-02-14  7:26 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] raid5: " Byungchul Park
2017-02-16 22:48   ` Shaohua Li
2017-02-14  7:26 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] vhost/scsi: " Byungchul Park
2017-02-19  5:42   ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2017-02-14  7:26 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] fput: " Byungchul Park
2017-02-14 17:44   ` Oleg Nesterov
2017-03-02 23:09     ` Byungchul Park
2017-02-14  7:26 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] namespace.c: " Byungchul Park
2017-02-14  7:26 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] irq_work: " Byungchul Park
2017-02-14  7:26 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] sched: " Byungchul Park
2017-02-22  5:04   ` Byungchul Park
2017-02-14  7:26 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] mm: " Byungchul Park
2017-05-02  8:03 ` Byungchul Park [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170502080320.GN21430@X58A-UD3R \
    --to=byungchul.park@lge.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@lge.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=nab@linux-iscsi.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=shli@kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox