From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1751467AbdEBUtS (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Tue, 2 May 2017 16:49:18 -0400
Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:59412 "EHLO
        ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1751239AbdEBUtQ (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 2 May 2017 16:49:16 -0400
Date: Tue, 2 May 2017 21:49:13 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] AT_NO_JUMPS/LOOKUP_NO_JUMPS
Message-ID: <20170502204913.GE29622@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
References: <20170319172414.GT29622@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
 <20170502195740.GA4427@amd>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170502195740.GA4427@amd>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 09:57:40PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Sun 2017-03-19 17:24:15, Al Viro wrote:
> > 	Bringing back an old conversation - what do you think about the
> > potential usefulness of the following ...at() option:
> > 	* no mountpoint crossings allowed (mount --bind included)
> 
> Returning error or returning the object that should be hidden by the
> mount?

Error, obviously - as clearly said a few lines below...