From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752798AbdECN5u (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 May 2017 09:57:50 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.136]:43400 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751998AbdECN5n (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 May 2017 09:57:43 -0400 Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 21:57:18 +0800 From: Shawn Guo To: Marek Vasut Cc: Leonard Crestez , Fabio Estevam , Sascha Hauer , Peter Chen , Anson Huang , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , Viresh Kumar , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-kernel , Fabio Estevam , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Christoph Fritz Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: imx6sx-sdb: Remove cpufreq OPP override Message-ID: <20170503135715.GG18578@dragon> References: <89cc7192100bdc9ce546bf6000446e629457ebc1.1493138693.git.leonard.crestez@nxp.com> <1493141004.3557.8.camel@nxp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 07:28:06PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > On 04/25/2017 07:23 PM, Leonard Crestez wrote: > > Anyway, that version also sets the supply for reg_arm and reg_soc. It > > is not necessary for fixing the crash I'm seeing but is good because it > > will result in the minimum voltage on VDD_ARM_SOC_IN rather than a fix > > 1375mv. I tested Marek's patch and it works fine on my rev B board > > (which otherwise fails to boot upstream). > > Oh that's nice , thanks ! I don't have SDB and I hacked it up after a > brief discussion with Fabio without even compile-testing it, thus RFC. > Glad to hear it works and thanks for testing it ! Can you add a formal > Tested-by please ? Hi Marek, Thanks for your patch. But I prefer Leonard's version because: 1) it has a better commit log; 2) it sticks to one-patch-does-one-thing policy. But I'm going to wait for a while to get Peter's comment discussed, before I actually apply Leonard's patch. Shawn