From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.xyz>,
Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: use non-devm kmalloc versions for free functions
Date: Thu, 4 May 2017 12:00:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170504160032.GA5147@htj.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170504120314.lfmcv4cpsuz2igte@lukather>
Hello,
On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 02:03:14PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > @@ -704,6 +704,7 @@ static void pinctrl_generic_free_groups(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev)
> > radix_tree_delete(&pctldev->pin_group_tree, indices[i]);
> > devm_kfree(pctldev->dev, group);
> > }
> > + kfree(indices);
>
> We use devm_kfree for other allocations done here, maybe we can just
> have the same thing here? We would be consistant, and we would still
> keep the resource tracking.
It doesn't make any sense to use the managed functions from the
release functions and if you're always matching devm_kmalloc() with
devm_kfree(), the only thing it'd do is confusing its readers.
And the function in question just looks weird to me - give up on
freeing resources if memory allocation fails? And why call
devm_kfree() on objects which are being released anyway? Or if the
group can be released w/o the device being detached, why use devm
allocations on the members at all?
As for removal, can't it just call radix_tree_iter_delete() while
iterating? Why allocate memory to iterate and store all indices and
to look them up again and delete them?
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-04 16:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-03 23:57 [PATCH] pinctrl: use non-devm kmalloc versions for free functions Andre Przywara
2017-05-04 12:03 ` Maxime Ripard
2017-05-04 16:00 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2017-05-05 0:41 ` André Przywara
2017-05-05 19:55 ` Maxime Ripard
2017-05-05 21:49 ` Tejun Heo
2017-05-11 14:01 ` Linus Walleij
2017-05-11 14:02 ` [linux-sunxi] " Icenowy Zheng
2017-05-11 14:20 ` Andre Przywara
2017-05-11 14:45 ` Tejun Heo
2017-05-12 9:25 ` Linus Walleij
2017-05-12 15:35 ` Tony Lindgren
2017-05-12 17:14 ` Tony Lindgren
2017-05-13 0:24 ` André Przywara
2017-05-22 15:37 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170504160032.GA5147@htj.duckdns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=icenowy@aosc.xyz \
--cc=kilobyte@angband.pl \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com \
--cc=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
--cc=wens@csie.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox