From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755298AbdEEJCH (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 May 2017 05:02:07 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([65.50.211.133]:35511 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751116AbdEEJCF (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 May 2017 05:02:05 -0400 Date: Fri, 5 May 2017 02:02:01 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Thierry Escande Cc: Bart Van Assche , "James E . J . Bottomley" , "Martin K . Petersen" , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sd: Ignore sync cache failures when not supported Message-ID: <20170505090201.GA31209@infradead.org> References: <1493891010-24258-1-git-send-email-thierry.escande@collabora.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1493891010-24258-1-git-send-email-thierry.escande@collabora.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23) X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Normally we'd just pass the scsi_sense_hdr structure in from the caler if we care about sense data. Is this something you considered? Otherwise this looks fine to me.