From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752085AbdEEJUv (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 May 2017 05:20:51 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f67.google.com ([74.125.82.67]:36127 "EHLO mail-wm0-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751116AbdEEJUu (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 May 2017 05:20:50 -0400 Date: Fri, 5 May 2017 11:20:46 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: xlpang@redhat.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, Eric Biederman , Dave Young , x86@kernel.org, Borislav Petkov , Thomas Gleixner , Yinghai Lu , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andy Lutomirski Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] x86_64/kexec: Use PUD level 1GB page for identity mapping if available Message-ID: <20170505092046.2qu72pdherfxjmec@gmail.com> References: <1493862171-8799-1-git-send-email-xlpang@redhat.com> <1493862171-8799-2-git-send-email-xlpang@redhat.com> <20170505065253.s5yv7c2cxgfcf4i3@gmail.com> <590C2A96.3090106@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <590C2A96.3090106@redhat.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Xunlei Pang wrote: > On 05/05/2017 at 02:52 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Xunlei Pang wrote: > > > >> @@ -122,6 +122,10 @@ static int init_pgtable(struct kimage *image, unsigned long start_pgtable) > >> > >> level4p = (pgd_t *)__va(start_pgtable); > >> clear_page(level4p); > >> + > >> + if (direct_gbpages) > >> + info.direct_gbpages = true; > > No, this should be keyed off the CPU feature (X86_FEATURE_GBPAGES) automatically, > > not set blindly! AFAICS this patch will crash kexec on any CPU that does not > > support gbpages. > > It should be fine, probe_page_size_mask() already takes care of this: > if (direct_gbpages && boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_GBPAGES)) { > printk(KERN_INFO "Using GB pages for direct mapping\n"); > page_size_mask |= 1 << PG_LEVEL_1G; > } else { > direct_gbpages = 0; > } > > So if X86_FEATURE_GBPAGES is not supported, direct_gbpages will be set to 0. So why is the introduction of the info.direct_gbpages flag necessary? AFAICS it just duplicates the kernel's direct_gbpages flag. One outcome is that hibernation won't use gbpages, which is silly. Thanks, Ingo