public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] signal: Export signal_wake_up_state() to modules
Date: Sat, 6 May 2017 21:42:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170506194256.GA21726@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1493977751-19340-1-git-send-email-geert+renesas@glider.be>

On 05/05, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
> I'm using signal_wake_up() to abort a task blocked on
> wait_for_completion_interruptible(), cfr. sh_msiof_slave_abort() in
> "spi: sh-msiof: Add slave mode support"
> (http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg175575.html).
>
> Is exporting signal_wake_up_state() an acceptable solution?
> Alternatively, I can extract the code to abort an completion into a
> generic abort_completion() function, and export that.

I too do not think this is a good idea... signal_wake_up() or even
set_tsk_thread_flag() should never be used unless you actually send a
signal. Yes, freeze_task() does this too but note that recalc_sigpending()
checks freezing() and in this case we really want the target to enter the
get_signal() path.

And in fact I do not really understand why do you need it, it seems that
you can easily rework this code and avoid this hack.

Not to mention that sh_msiof_slave_abort() plays with struct completion
internals, this doesn't look good too.

Finally, clear_thread_flag(TIF_SIGPENDING) in sh_msiof_wait_for_completion()
looks wrong. Or it is only for kthreads?

Oleg.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-05-06 19:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-05  9:49 [PATCH/RFC] signal: Export signal_wake_up_state() to modules Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-05-05 10:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-05-05 10:13   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-05-05 11:08     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-05-05 11:22       ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-05-05 11:35         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-05-06 19:42 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2017-05-07  9:47   ` Geert Uytterhoeven

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170506194256.GA21726@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox