From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752925AbdEHGho (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 May 2017 02:37:44 -0400 Received: from mail-pg0-f66.google.com ([74.125.83.66]:34969 "EHLO mail-pg0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751710AbdEHGhn (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 May 2017 02:37:43 -0400 Date: Mon, 8 May 2017 15:37:41 +0900 From: Sergey Senozhatsky To: Steven Rostedt , Petr Mladek , Jan Kara , Pavel Machek Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" , Ye Xiaolong , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Peter Zijlstra , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jiri Slaby , Len Brown , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lkp@01.org, Sergey Senozhatsky , Sergey Senozhatsky Subject: Re: [printk] fbc14616f4: BUG:kernel_reboot-without-warning_in_test_stage Message-ID: <20170508063741.GA364@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain> References: <87a881v52o.fsf@xmission.com> <20170403093152.GB15168@quack2.suse.cz> <20170406173306.GD10363@amd> <20170407044334.GA487@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain> <20170407071558.GA11792@amd> <20170407074634.GB1091@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain> <20170407081449.GA12859@amd> <20170407121021.GA379@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain> <20170407124455.GC4756@amd> <20170407104042.3c8e91e0@gandalf.local.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170407104042.3c8e91e0@gandalf.local.home> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.2 (2017-04-18) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, On (04/07/17 10:40), Steven Rostedt wrote: [..] > On Fri, 7 Apr 2017 14:44:55 +0200 > Pavel Machek wrote: > > > Well, I have to agree here. This is 20 years worth of mess :-(. > > Maybe someone should propose a micro-conf at Linux Plumbers where we > can brain storm a way to re-invent printk()? Seems it can do with a > completely new rewrite. ;-) So I've been thinking about it... I'm somewhat limited in budget this year and can do either LPC or KS* - purely depending on which one can "attract" a required critical mass. From _this_ point of view KS, perhaps, would be more appropriate, especially given that it's in EU this year, if I'm not mistaken. But LPC has its own merits too, of course. LPC's microconference sounds good enough. What do you guys think? * I obviously don't expect to be invited to the KS, all I said is that I can be in Prague around that time so we can sit somewhere and talk. -ss