From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757292AbdELISV (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 May 2017 04:18:21 -0400 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:34016 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756855AbdELISR (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 May 2017 04:18:17 -0400 Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 09:16:58 +0100 From: Al Viro To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Ingo Molnar , Andy Lutomirski , Greg KH , Thomas Garnier , Martin Schwidefsky , Heiko Carstens , Dave Hansen , Thomas Gleixner , David Howells , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9?= Nyffenegger , Andrew Morton , "Paul E . McKenney" , "Eric W . Biederman" , Oleg Nesterov , Pavel Tikhomirov , Ingo Molnar , "H . Peter Anvin" , Paolo Bonzini , Rik van Riel , Kees Cook , Josh Poimboeuf , Borislav Petkov , Brian Gerst , "Kirill A . Shutemov" , Christian Borntraeger , Russell King , Will Deacon , Catalin Marinas , Mark Rutland , James Morse , linux-s390 , LKML , Linux API , the arch/x86 maintainers , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Kernel Hardening , Linus Torvalds , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH v9 1/4] syscalls: Verify address limit before returning to user-mode Message-ID: <20170512081658.GR390@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20170508073352.caqe3fqf7nuxypgi@gmail.com> <20170508124621.GA20705@kroah.com> <20170509064522.anusoikaalvlux3w@gmail.com> <20170509085659.GA32555@infradead.org> <20170512070012.7dysuhbkcas7ibaj@gmail.com> <20170512071549.GP390@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20170512081126.GA7188@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170512081126.GA7188@infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 01:11:26AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > But it won't help against exploits modifying addr_limit manually. Or the ones setting current->cred to that of init. Your point being?