public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl>,
	Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>,
	linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>, Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.xyz>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: use non-devm kmalloc versions for free functions
Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 10:14:17 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170512171417.GH3489@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170512153522.GG3489@atomide.com>

* Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> [170512 08:39]:
> * Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> [170512 02:28]:
> > On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 4:20 PM, Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> wrote:
> > > Linus, can you shed some light if this array creation serves some purpose?
> > 
> > Tony [author of this function] can you look at this?
> > 
> > The code in pinctrl_generic_free_groups() does look a bit weird,
> > allocating these indices just to remove the radix tree.
> > Do you think we can clean it up?
> 
> Yup indeed it seems totally pointless. Also the same code can be
> removed from pinmux_generic_free_functions().
> 
> It must be left over code from my initial attempts to to add
> generic pinctrl groups and functions when I still though we need
> to keep a static array around for the indices to keep pinctrl
> happy. Then I probably did some robotic compile fixes after
> updating things to use just the radix tree and added indices
> locally to both functions..

Hmm no that, can't be, I think I figured it out.. See the patch
below.

Regards,

Tony

8< ---------------------------
>From tony Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 08:47:57 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] pinctrl: core: Fix warning by removing bogus code

Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> noticed that we can get the
following warning with -EPROBE_DEFER:

"WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 89 at drivers/base/dd.c:349
driver_probe_device+0x2ac/0x2e8"

Let's fix the issue by removing the indices as suggested by
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>. All we have to do here is kill the radix
tree.

I probably ended up with the indices after grepping for removal
of all entries using radix_tree_for_each_slot() and the first
match found was gmap_radix_tree_free(). Anyways, no need for
indices here, and we can just do remove all the entries using
radix_tree_for_each_slot() along how the item_kill_tree() test
case does.

Fixes: c7059c5ac70a ("pinctrl: core: Add generic pinctrl functions
for managing groups")
Fixes: a76edc89b100 ("pinctrl: core: Add generic pinctrl functions
for managing groups")
Reported-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
---
 drivers/pinctrl/core.c   | 20 +++-----------------
 drivers/pinctrl/pinmux.c | 21 ++++-----------------
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/core.c b/drivers/pinctrl/core.c
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/core.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/core.c
@@ -680,30 +680,16 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pinctrl_generic_remove_group);
  * pinctrl_generic_free_groups() - removes all pin groups
  * @pctldev: pin controller device
  *
- * Note that the caller must take care of locking.
+ * Note that the caller must take care of locking. The pinctrl groups
+ * are allocated with devm_kzalloc() so no need to free them here.
  */
 static void pinctrl_generic_free_groups(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev)
 {
 	struct radix_tree_iter iter;
-	struct group_desc *group;
-	unsigned long *indices;
 	void **slot;
-	int i = 0;
-
-	indices = devm_kzalloc(pctldev->dev, sizeof(*indices) *
-			       pctldev->num_groups, GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!indices)
-		return;
 
 	radix_tree_for_each_slot(slot, &pctldev->pin_group_tree, &iter, 0)
-		indices[i++] = iter.index;
-
-	for (i = 0; i < pctldev->num_groups; i++) {
-		group = radix_tree_lookup(&pctldev->pin_group_tree,
-					  indices[i]);
-		radix_tree_delete(&pctldev->pin_group_tree, indices[i]);
-		devm_kfree(pctldev->dev, group);
-	}
+		radix_tree_delete(&pctldev->pin_group_tree, iter.index);
 
 	pctldev->num_groups = 0;
 }
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinmux.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinmux.c
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinmux.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinmux.c
@@ -826,30 +826,17 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pinmux_generic_remove_function);
  * pinmux_generic_free_functions() - removes all functions
  * @pctldev: pin controller device
  *
- * Note that the caller must take care of locking.
+ * Note that the caller must take care of locking. The pinctrl
+ * functions are allocated with devm_kzalloc() so no need to free
+ * them here.
  */
 void pinmux_generic_free_functions(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev)
 {
 	struct radix_tree_iter iter;
-	struct function_desc *function;
-	unsigned long *indices;
 	void **slot;
-	int i = 0;
-
-	indices = devm_kzalloc(pctldev->dev, sizeof(*indices) *
-			       pctldev->num_functions, GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!indices)
-		return;
 
 	radix_tree_for_each_slot(slot, &pctldev->pin_function_tree, &iter, 0)
-		indices[i++] = iter.index;
-
-	for (i = 0; i < pctldev->num_functions; i++) {
-		function = radix_tree_lookup(&pctldev->pin_function_tree,
-					     indices[i]);
-		radix_tree_delete(&pctldev->pin_function_tree, indices[i]);
-		devm_kfree(pctldev->dev, function);
-	}
+		radix_tree_delete(&pctldev->pin_function_tree, iter.index);
 
 	pctldev->num_functions = 0;
 }
-- 
2.13.0

  reply	other threads:[~2017-05-12 17:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-03 23:57 [PATCH] pinctrl: use non-devm kmalloc versions for free functions Andre Przywara
2017-05-04 12:03 ` Maxime Ripard
2017-05-04 16:00   ` Tejun Heo
2017-05-05  0:41     ` André Przywara
2017-05-05 19:55     ` Maxime Ripard
2017-05-05 21:49       ` Tejun Heo
2017-05-11 14:01 ` Linus Walleij
2017-05-11 14:02   ` [linux-sunxi] " Icenowy Zheng
2017-05-11 14:20   ` Andre Przywara
2017-05-11 14:45     ` Tejun Heo
2017-05-12  9:25     ` Linus Walleij
2017-05-12 15:35       ` Tony Lindgren
2017-05-12 17:14         ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2017-05-13  0:24           ` André Przywara
2017-05-22 15:37           ` Linus Walleij

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170512171417.GH3489@atomide.com \
    --to=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=icenowy@aosc.xyz \
    --cc=kilobyte@angband.pl \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=wens@csie.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox