From: Vadim Lomovtsev <Vadim.Lomovtsev@caviumnetworks.com>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Sergey Temerkhanov <s.temerkhanov@gmail.com>,
Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>,
Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com>,
Vadim.Lomovtsev@caviumnetworks.com
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH v2 0/3] PCI: generic device NUMA node detection
Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 06:51:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170515135157.GB9700@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170515132205.19622-1-lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 02:22:02PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> This patch series is v2 of a previous posting:
>
> v1 -> v2:
>
> - Added missing call to acpi_pci_bus_find_numa_node()
> - Rebased against v4.12-rc1
>
> v1: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/4/26/211
>
> On the ARM64 architecture, the arch specific PCI pcibus_to_node() callback
> can be triggered on struct pci_bus.sysdata structures that carry host
> bridge specific data through different structures layout (ie sysdata
> pointer points at different structs for different host bridges), therefore
> it is not possible to have a unified pcibus_to_node() implementation.
>
> Given that the device NUMA node is a property of the struct pci_bus (and
> its associated struct device), move the struct pci_bus node assignment to
> generic PCI code, where according to the platform firmware the NUMA node
> for the device backing the struct pci_bus is retrieved and propagated
> through the PCI bus hierarchy.
>
> Lorenzo Pieralisi (3):
> PCI: Introduce pci_bus_find_numa_node()
> PCI: Add call to set-up NUMA node for struct pci_bus devices
> PCI/ACPI: Add ACPI pci_bus_find_numa_node() implementation
>
> drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/pci/pci.c | 6 ++++++
> drivers/pci/probe.c | 3 ++-
> include/linux/pci.h | 7 +++++++
> 4 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
Tested at dual-socketed system with Cavium ThunderX SoC.
Tested with 4.11 kernel.
No issues observed, numa_node value set appropriately for pci devices.
Tested-by: Vadim Lomovtsev <Vadim.Lomovtsev@caviumnetworks.com>
> --
> 2.10.0
>
WBR,
Vadim
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-15 13:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-15 13:22 [RFC/RFT PATCH v2 0/3] PCI: generic device NUMA node detection Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-05-15 13:22 ` [RFC/RFT PATCH v2 1/3] PCI: Introduce pci_bus_find_numa_node() Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-05-15 13:22 ` [RFC/RFT PATCH v2 2/3] PCI: Add call to set-up NUMA node for struct pci_bus devices Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-05-15 13:22 ` [RFC/RFT PATCH v2 3/3] PCI/ACPI: Add ACPI pci_bus_find_numa_node() implementation Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-05-16 15:15 ` Robert Richter
2017-05-16 18:02 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-05-17 13:46 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-05-17 14:35 ` Robert Richter
2017-05-17 16:04 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-05-17 16:15 ` Robert Richter
2017-05-15 13:51 ` Vadim Lomovtsev [this message]
2017-05-16 14:57 ` [RFC/RFT PATCH v2 0/3] PCI: generic device NUMA node detection Robert Richter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170515135157.GB9700@localhost.localdomain \
--to=vadim.lomovtsev@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=okaya@codeaurora.org \
--cc=s.temerkhanov@gmail.com \
--cc=wangzhou1@hisilicon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox