From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S938441AbdEYNSo (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Thu, 25 May 2017 09:18:44 -0400
Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:41242 "EHLO
        mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S933110AbdEYNSm (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 25 May 2017 09:18:42 -0400
Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 15:18:31 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
        vincent.guittot@linaro.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
        linux@arm.linux.org.uk, sudeep.holla@arm.com,
        lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
        will.deacon@arm.com, morten.rasmussen@arm.com,
        dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, broonie@kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] Fix issues and factorize arm/arm64 capacity
 information code
Message-ID: <20170525131831.GF16244@kroah.com>
References: <20170420144316.15632-1-juri.lelli@arm.com>
 <20170511084830.rn32pvi6weej2cna@e106622-lin>
 <20170511085952.GA6934@kroah.com>
 <20170511102718.qy54ajkzphasymhr@e106622-lin>
 <20170524144515.nuccflbdashlqmcs@e106622-lin>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170524144515.nuccflbdashlqmcs@e106622-lin>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.2 (2017-04-18)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 03:45:15PM +0100, Juri Lelli wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 11/05/17 11:27, Juri Lelli wrote:
> > On 11/05/17 10:59, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 09:48:30AM +0100, Juri Lelli wrote:
> > > > Hi Greg,
> > > > 
> > > > I'm not sure what your plans are with this set. Are we targeting 4.12?
> > > > 
> > > > IMHO, if possible, it would be good to have this refactoring in now, so
> > > > that we can base further development on it for the next cycle.
> > > 
> > > It's way too late for new features that have not been in linux-next for
> > > a few weeks, to get merged into 4.12-rc1, sorry.  I'll review this
> > > patchset after -rc1 is out, and I get a chance to catch up on pending
> > > patches.
> > > 
> > 
> > Thanks for your reply, I perfecly understand.
> > 
> > OK, let's target 4.13 then. Looking forward to receive your comments
> > after -rc1 is out.
> > 
> 
> Did you have any chance to have a look at this set?

Now reviewed.  Looks fine except for the final names in the last patch,
naming is hard, I know :)

thanks,

greg k-h