From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1751110AbdE3KD6 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Tue, 30 May 2017 06:03:58 -0400
Received: from mail-wm0-f52.google.com ([74.125.82.52]:36245 "EHLO
        mail-wm0-f52.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1750867AbdE3KDz (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 30 May 2017 06:03:55 -0400
Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 12:03:51 +0200
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>,
        "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        Ryan Chen <ryan_chen@aspeedtech.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clocksource: moxart: Add AST2500 compatible string
Message-ID: <20170530100351.GD2192@mai>
References: <20170516075840.23130-1-andrew@aj.id.au>
 <CACRpkdZsbzwBKRj1FXAoCW9nD357SNNK8t=gOO-OBtV_pwjpKg@mail.gmail.com>
 <0f526d58-3138-d7ea-0dc7-5ef623fb0547@linaro.org>
 <CACRpkdYbicYPJvaeTMpHSn4F77ognBfnEbj7OknFiZgfK1qizA@mail.gmail.com>
 <1a165856-6863-ad51-d66c-eda062f4d98e@linaro.org>
 <CACRpkdYtq09MYz4xcgYOpKDe406YzatnRKNmVyP9QRU2z5x2_g@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdYtq09MYz4xcgYOpKDe406YzatnRKNmVyP9QRU2z5x2_g@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 11:53:35AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Daniel Lezcano
> <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> wrote:
> > On 30/05/2017 09:44, Linus Walleij wrote:
> 
> >> I guess what we can do is make two different sched_clock()
> >> callbacks: one for upward and one for downward counting.
> >>
> >> Would you like an optimization like that?
> >>
> >> (It makes sense.)
> >
> > Yes, thanks Linus!
> 
> Can you point me to a git tree with all your patches so I can work
> on top of what you have?
> 
> I think I will also look into adding delay timers.

https://git.linaro.org/people/daniel.lezcano/linux.git clockevents/4.13

(subject to rebase)

-- 

 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog