linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
To: Gioh Kim <gi-oh.kim@profitbricks.com>
Cc: andre.przywara@amd.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] KVM: SVM: ignore type when setting segment registers
Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 14:54:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170530125420.GA19724@potion> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1496064244-14785-1-git-send-email-gi-oh.kim@profitbricks.com>

2017-05-29 15:24+0200, Gioh Kim:
> Current code sets unusable as 1 if present is 1 and type is 0.
> In Long mode, type value in segment descriptor is ignored.
> So I think type should be ignored when setting the segment registers,
> if type means the descriptor type in the segment descriptor.
> 
> Is the type field of struct kvm_segment the descriptor type?

Yes.

> If so, why type is checked when setting segment registers?

No idea.  19bca6ab75d8 ("KVM: SVM: Fix cross vendor migration issue with
unusable bit") also moved the assigment up to initialize it before use
and I think that is enough.

> If the type field is not the descriptor type,
> is it ok to set unusable when present is 1?

Looks like a bug.  type = 0 can be a usable read-only data segment.

> I'm copying a code as following to show what code I'm asking.

Please send it as a patch,

thanks.

> ----------------------------- 8< ---------------------------------
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> index 5f48f62..0133f6f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> @@ -1803,7 +1803,7 @@ static void svm_get_segment(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  	 * AMD's VMCB does not have an explicit unusable field, so emulate it
>  	 * for cross vendor migration purposes by "not present"
>  	 */
> -	var->unusable = !var->present || (var->type == 0);
> +	var->unusable = !var->present;
>  
>  	switch (seg) {
>  	case VCPU_SREG_TR:
> -- 
> 2.5.0
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2017-05-30 12:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-29 13:24 [RFC] KVM: SVM: ignore type when setting segment registers Gioh Kim
2017-05-30 12:54 ` Radim Krčmář [this message]
2017-05-30 13:37   ` Gioh Kim
2017-05-30 18:03   ` Matt Mullins
2017-05-31  6:42     ` Gi-Oh Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170530125420.GA19724@potion \
    --to=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    --cc=andre.przywara@amd.com \
    --cc=gi-oh.kim@profitbricks.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).