public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: jeffy <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>,
	Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
	dianders@chromium.org, tfiga@chromium.org
Subject: [patch 1/2] genirq: Handle NOAUTOEN interrupt setup proper
Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 11:58:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170531100212.130986205@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20170531095831.291595474@linutronix.de

[-- Attachment #1: genirq--Handle-NOAUTOEN-interrupt-setup-proper.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 5490 bytes --]

If an interrupt is marked NOAUTOEN then request_irq() installs the action,
but does not enable the interrupt via startup_irq().  The interrupt is
enabled via enable_irq() later from the driver. enable_irq() calls
irq_enable().

That means that for interrupts which have a irq_startup() callback this
callback is never invoked. Neither is irq_domain_activate_irq() invoked for
such interrupts.

If an interrupt depends on irq_startup() or irq_domain_activate_irq() then
the enable via irq_enable() is not enough.

Add a status flag IRQD_IRQ_STARTED_UP and use this to select the proper
mechanism in enable_irq(). Use the flag also to avoid pointless calls into
the low level functions.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
 include/linux/irq.h    |    6 ++++
 kernel/irq/chip.c      |   73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 kernel/irq/internals.h |    1 
 kernel/irq/manage.c    |    2 -
 4 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

--- a/include/linux/irq.h
+++ b/include/linux/irq.h
@@ -216,6 +216,7 @@ enum {
 	IRQD_WAKEUP_ARMED		= (1 << 19),
 	IRQD_FORWARDED_TO_VCPU		= (1 << 20),
 	IRQD_AFFINITY_MANAGED		= (1 << 21),
+	IRQD_IRQ_STARTED_UP		= (1 << 22),
 };
 
 #define __irqd_to_state(d) ACCESS_PRIVATE((d)->common, state_use_accessors)
@@ -329,6 +330,11 @@ static inline void irqd_clr_activated(st
 	__irqd_to_state(d) &= ~IRQD_ACTIVATED;
 }
 
+static inline bool irqd_is_started_up(struct irq_data *d)
+{
+	return __irqd_to_state(d) & IRQD_IRQ_STARTED_UP;
+}
+
 #undef __irqd_to_state
 
 static inline irq_hw_number_t irqd_to_hwirq(struct irq_data *d)
--- a/kernel/irq/chip.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/chip.c
@@ -185,37 +185,71 @@ static void irq_state_set_masked(struct
 	irqd_set(&desc->irq_data, IRQD_IRQ_MASKED);
 }
 
+static void irq_state_clr_started(struct irq_desc *desc)
+{
+	irqd_clear(&desc->irq_data, IRQD_IRQ_STARTED_UP);
+}
+
+static void irq_state_set_started(struct irq_desc *desc)
+{
+	irqd_set(&desc->irq_data, IRQD_IRQ_STARTED_UP);
+}
+
 int irq_startup(struct irq_desc *desc, bool resend)
 {
 	int ret = 0;
 
-	irq_state_clr_disabled(desc);
+	if (irqd_is_started_up(&desc->irq_data))
+		return 0;
+
 	desc->depth = 0;
 
 	irq_domain_activate_irq(&desc->irq_data);
 	if (desc->irq_data.chip->irq_startup) {
 		ret = desc->irq_data.chip->irq_startup(&desc->irq_data);
+		irq_state_clr_disabled(desc);
 		irq_state_clr_masked(desc);
 	} else {
 		irq_enable(desc);
 	}
+	irq_state_set_started(desc);
+
 	if (resend)
 		check_irq_resend(desc);
+
 	return ret;
 }
 
+static void __irq_disable(struct irq_desc *desc, bool mask);
+
 void irq_shutdown(struct irq_desc *desc)
 {
-	irq_state_set_disabled(desc);
-	desc->depth = 1;
-	if (desc->irq_data.chip->irq_shutdown)
-		desc->irq_data.chip->irq_shutdown(&desc->irq_data);
-	else if (desc->irq_data.chip->irq_disable)
-		desc->irq_data.chip->irq_disable(&desc->irq_data);
-	else
-		desc->irq_data.chip->irq_mask(&desc->irq_data);
+	if (irqd_is_started_up(&desc->irq_data)) {
+		desc->depth = 1;
+		if (desc->irq_data.chip->irq_shutdown) {
+			desc->irq_data.chip->irq_shutdown(&desc->irq_data);
+			irq_state_set_disabled(desc);
+			irq_state_set_masked(desc);
+		} else {
+			__irq_disable(desc, true);
+		}
+		irq_state_clr_started(desc);
+	}
+	/*
+	 * This must be called even if the interrupt was never started up,
+	 * because the activation can happen before the interrupt is
+	 * available for request/startup. It has it's own state tracking so
+	 * it's safe to call it unconditonally.
+	 */
 	irq_domain_deactivate_irq(&desc->irq_data);
-	irq_state_set_masked(desc);
+}
+
+void irq_enable_or_startup(struct irq_desc *desc)
+{
+	if (!irqd_is_started_up(&desc->irq_data))
+		irq_startup(desc, false);
+	else
+		irq_enable(desc);
 }
 
 void irq_enable(struct irq_desc *desc)
@@ -228,6 +262,17 @@ void irq_enable(struct irq_desc *desc)
 	irq_state_clr_masked(desc);
 }
 
+static void __irq_disable(struct irq_desc *desc, bool mask)
+{
+	irq_state_set_disabled(desc);
+	if (desc->irq_data.chip->irq_disable) {
+		desc->irq_data.chip->irq_disable(&desc->irq_data);
+		irq_state_set_masked(desc);
+	} else if (mask) {
+		mask_irq(desc);
+	}
+}
+
 /**
  * irq_disable - Mark interrupt disabled
  * @desc:	irq descriptor which should be disabled
@@ -250,13 +295,7 @@ void irq_enable(struct irq_desc *desc)
  */
 void irq_disable(struct irq_desc *desc)
 {
-	irq_state_set_disabled(desc);
-	if (desc->irq_data.chip->irq_disable) {
-		desc->irq_data.chip->irq_disable(&desc->irq_data);
-		irq_state_set_masked(desc);
-	} else if (irq_settings_disable_unlazy(desc)) {
-		mask_irq(desc);
-	}
+	__irq_disable(desc, irq_settings_disable_unlazy(desc));
 }
 
 void irq_percpu_enable(struct irq_desc *desc, unsigned int cpu)
--- a/kernel/irq/internals.h
+++ b/kernel/irq/internals.h
@@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ extern void __enable_irq(struct irq_desc
 
 extern int irq_startup(struct irq_desc *desc, bool resend);
 extern void irq_shutdown(struct irq_desc *desc);
+extern void irq_enable_or_startup(struct irq_desc *desc);
 extern void irq_enable(struct irq_desc *desc);
 extern void irq_disable(struct irq_desc *desc);
 extern void irq_percpu_enable(struct irq_desc *desc, unsigned int cpu);
--- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
@@ -533,7 +533,7 @@ void __enable_irq(struct irq_desc *desc)
 			goto err_out;
 		/* Prevent probing on this irq: */
 		irq_settings_set_noprobe(desc);
-		irq_enable(desc);
+		irq_enable_or_startup(desc);
 		check_irq_resend(desc);
 		/* fall-through */
 	}

  reply	other threads:[~2017-05-31 10:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-31  9:58 [patch 0/2] genirq: Handle NOAUTOEN interrupts correctly Thomas Gleixner
2017-05-31  9:58 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2017-05-31 13:54   ` [patch 1/2] genirq: Handle NOAUTOEN interrupt setup proper Marc Zyngier
2017-05-31 15:18     ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-06-04 12:47   ` [tip:irq/core] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2017-05-31  9:58 ` [patch 2/2] genirq: Warn when IRQ_NOAUTOEN is used with shared interrupts Thomas Gleixner
2017-06-04 12:48   ` [tip:irq/core] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2017-09-06  6:00   ` [2/2] " Paul Burton
2017-09-06  8:16     ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-09-06 14:01       ` Paul Burton
2017-09-06 14:14         ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-09-07  1:18           ` Paul Burton
2017-09-07 23:25             ` [RFC PATCH v1 0/9] Support shared percpu interrupts; clean up MIPS hacks Paul Burton
2017-09-07 23:25               ` [RFC PATCH v1 1/9] genirq: Allow shared interrupt users to opt into IRQ_NOAUTOEN Paul Burton
2017-09-07 23:25               ` [RFC PATCH v1 2/9] genirq: Support shared per_cpu_devid interrupts Paul Burton
2017-09-25 21:06                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-09-26 12:00                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-10-19 14:08                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-09-07 23:25               ` [RFC PATCH v1 3/9] genirq: Introduce irq_is_percpu_devid() Paul Burton
2017-09-07 23:25               ` [RFC PATCH v1 4/9] MIPS: Remove perf_irq interrupt sharing fallback Paul Burton
2017-09-07 23:25               ` [RFC PATCH v1 5/9] MIPS: Remove perf_irq Paul Burton
2017-09-07 23:25               ` [RFC PATCH v1 6/9] MIPS: perf: percpu_devid interrupt support Paul Burton
2017-10-19 14:12                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-09-07 23:25               ` [RFC PATCH v1 7/9] MIPS: cevt-r4k: " Paul Burton
2017-09-07 23:25               ` [RFC PATCH v1 8/9] irqchip: mips-cpu: Set timer, FDC & perf interrupts percpu_devid Paul Burton
2017-09-07 23:25               ` [RFC PATCH v1 9/9] irqchip: mips-gic: Remove gic_all_vpes_local_irq_controller Paul Burton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170531100212.130986205@linutronix.de \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=briannorris@chromium.org \
    --cc=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=tfiga@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox